167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16571191)
1. Impact of CEDIT recommendations: An example of health technology assessment in a hospital network.
Bodeau-Livinec F; Simon E; Montagnier-Petrissans C; Joël ME; Féry-Lemonnier E
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 16571191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Integration of health technology assessment recommendations into organizational and clinical practice: A case study in Catalonia.
Gagnon MP; Sánchez E; Pons JM
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 16571192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High technology in health care.
Durand-Zaleski I; Jolly D
Qual Assur Health Care; 1990; 2(3-4):321-7. PubMed ID: 1983252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: a way to increase impact.
McGregor M; Brophy JM
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):263-7. PubMed ID: 15921068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Examples of the influence of evaluation on health policy.
Durieux P; Viens-Bitker C; Jolly D; Blum-Boisgard C
Health Policy; 1988; 9(3):325-30. PubMed ID: 10302543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Selection of new health technologies for assessment aimed at informing decision making: A survey among horizon scanning systems.
Douw K; Vondeling H
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 16571193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Managing of an innovation in health care: the case of polyvalent intravenous immunoglobulins at the Assistance-Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris].
Minvielle E; Viens-Bitker C; Rochant H; Baur M; Bussel A; Souag A; Kazatchkine M; Etienne JP
Ann Med Interne (Paris); 1995; 146(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 7741389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. National Authority for Health: France.
Rochaix L; Xerri B
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund); 2009 Jul; 58():1-9. PubMed ID: 19639712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Approaching hospital administration about adopting cooling technologies.
Kirkland LL; Parham WM; Pastores SM
Crit Care Med; 2009 Jul; 37(7 Suppl):S290-4. PubMed ID: 19535961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. International diffusion of new health technologies: a ten-country analysis of six health technologies.
Packer C; Simpson S; Stevens A;
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 16984674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Joint project of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment--Part 2: Managing the diffusion of positron emission tomography with health technology assessment.
Adams EJ; Almazán C; Mørland B; Bradbury I; King R; Rheinberger P
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 16571189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recommendations in health technology assessments worldwide.
Draborg E; Andersen CK
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 16571190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early identification and assessment of new and emerging health technologies: actions, progress, and the future direction of an international collaboration--EuroScan.
Simpson S; Packer C; Carlsson P; Sanders JM; Ibarluzea IG; Fay AF; Norderhaug I
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):518-25. PubMed ID: 18828949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Health technology assessment in Switzerland.
Koch P; Schilling J; Läubli M; Mitscherlich F; Melchart D; Bellucci S
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():174-7. PubMed ID: 19534839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technology assessment at work: Part I--Principles and a case study.
Cowan J; Berkowitz D
Physician Exec; 1996 Apr; 22(4):5-6, 8-9. PubMed ID: 10156730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. How to anticipate the assessment of the public health benefit of new medicines?
Massol J; Puech A; Boissel JP;
Therapie; 2007; 62(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 18206104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New technology planning and approval: critical factors for success.
Haselkorn A; Rosenstein AH; Rao AK; Van Zuiden M; Coye MJ
Am J Med Qual; 2007; 22(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 17485557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Attitudes to the use of a decision support method when introducing new medical technology at the University Hospital of Copenhagen].
Folkersen J; Pedersen PH
Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 May; 168(21):2069-74. PubMed ID: 16768926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health technology assessment in Finland.
Mäkelä M; Roine RP
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():102-7. PubMed ID: 19500439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. INTRODUCTION OF INNOVATIVE MEDICAL DEVICES AT FRENCH UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: AN OVERVIEW OF HOSPITAL-BASED HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT INITIATIVES.
Martelli N; Billaux M; Borget I; Pineau J; Prognon P; van den Brink H
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(1-2):12-8. PubMed ID: 25991072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
