134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16572038)
1. The impact of natural history parameters on the cost-effectiveness of Chlamydia trachomatis screening strategies.
Hu D; Hook EW; Goldie SJ
Sex Transm Dis; 2006 Jul; 33(7):428-36. PubMed ID: 16572038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Overestimation of complication rates in evaluations of Chlamydia trachomatis screening programmes--implications for cost-effectiveness analyses.
van Valkengoed IG; Morré SA; van den Brule AJ; Meijer CJ; Bouter LM; Boeke AJ
Int J Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 33(2):416-25. PubMed ID: 15082651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The program cost and cost-effectiveness of screening men for Chlamydia to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease in women.
Gift TL; Gaydos CA; Kent CK; Marrazzo JM; Rietmeijer CA; Schillinger JA; Dunne EF
Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Nov; 35(11 Suppl):S66-75. PubMed ID: 18830137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation of the burden of disease and costs of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Canada.
Tuite AR; Jayaraman GC; Allen VG; Fisman DN
Sex Transm Dis; 2012 Apr; 39(4):260-7. PubMed ID: 22421691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The cost and cost-effectiveness of opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in Ireland.
Gillespie P; O'Neill C; Adams E; Turner K; O'Donovan D; Brugha R; Vaughan D; O'Connell E; Cormican M; Balfe M; Coleman C; Fitzgerald M; Fleming C
Sex Transm Infect; 2012 Apr; 88(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 22213681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in women 15 to 29 years of age: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Hu D; Hook EW; Goldie SJ
Ann Intern Med; 2004 Oct; 141(7):501-13. PubMed ID: 15466767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An evaluation of economics and acceptability of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection, in women attending antenatal, abortion, colposcopy and family planning clinics in Scotland, UK.
Norman JE; Wu O; Twaddle S; Macmillan S; McMillan L; Templeton A; McKenzie H; Noone A; Allardice G; Reid M
BJOG; 2004 Nov; 111(11):1261-8. PubMed ID: 15521872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].
Ruitenberg EN
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 May; 143(19):1012. PubMed ID: 10368724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating adolescents in juvenile detention facilities for urogenital chlamydial infection: costs and effectiveness of alternative interventions.
Mrus JM; Biro FM; Huang B; Tsevat J
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2003 Jul; 157(7):696-702. PubMed ID: 12860793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and the cost-effectiveness of screening.
Land JA; Van Bergen JE; Morré SA; Postma MJ
Hum Reprod Update; 2010; 16(2):189-204. PubMed ID: 19828674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening and treating Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: interpretation of findings from randomized controlled trials.
Gottlieb SL; Xu F; Brunham RC
Sex Transm Dis; 2013 Feb; 40(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 23324973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening adolescent males for Chlamydia on admission to detention.
Blake DR; Gaydos CA; Quinn TC
Sex Transm Dis; 2004 Feb; 31(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 14743071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost effectiveness analysis of a population based screening programme for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women by means of home obtained urine specimens.
van Valkengoed IG; Postma MJ; Morré SA; van den Brule AJ; Meijer CJ; Bouter LM; Boeke AJ
Sex Transm Infect; 2001 Aug; 77(4):276-82. PubMed ID: 11463928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].
Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; van Doornum GJ; Coutinho RA; Jager JC
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):677-81. PubMed ID: 10321301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Screening for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnancy; cost-effectiveness favorable at a minimum prevalence rate of 3% or more].
Postma MJ; Bakker A; Welte R; van Bergen JE; van den Hoek JA; de Jong-van den Berg LT; Jager JC
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Dec; 144(49):2350-4. PubMed ID: 11129971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Chlamydia screening is not cost-effective at low participation rates: evidence from a repeated register-based implementation study in The Netherlands.
de Wit GA; Over EA; Schmid BV; van Bergen JE; van den Broek IV; van der Sande MA; Welte R; Op de Coul EL; Kretzschmar ME
Sex Transm Infect; 2015 Sep; 91(6):423-9. PubMed ID: 25759475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-utility of repeated screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.
de Vries R; van Bergen JE; de Jong-van den Berg LT; Postma MJ;
Value Health; 2008; 11(2):272-4. PubMed ID: 18380639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Potentials of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in Hungary: cost-benefit analysis].
Nyári T; Mészáros G; Deák J; Nagy E; Kovács L
Orv Hetil; 2000 Jul; 141(27):1511-6. PubMed ID: 10943109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modeled economic evaluation of alternative strategies to reduce sudden cardiac death among children treated for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Denchev P; Kaltman JR; Schoenbaum M; Vitiello B
Circulation; 2010 Mar; 121(11):1329-37. PubMed ID: 20212277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modelling the impact of opportunistic screening on the sequelae and public healthcare costs of infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in Australian women.
Ward B; Rodger AJ; Jackson TJ
Public Health; 2006 Jan; 120(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 16271271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
