These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1657530)

  • 1. Masking the readers may ensure objective judgment about clinical trials.
    Bang A
    Control Clin Trials; 1991 Aug; 12(4):553-5. PubMed ID: 1657530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Publication bias: its implications for clinical pharmacology.
    Levy G
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1992 Aug; 52(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 1505146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical trials in orthodontics II: assessment of the quality of reporting of clinical trials published in three orthodontic journals between 1989 and 1998.
    Harrison JE
    J Orthod; 2003 Dec; 30(4):309-15; discussion 297-8. PubMed ID: 14634169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Suspended judgment. Seeing through the double-masked design: a commentary.
    Greenberg RP; Fisher S
    Control Clin Trials; 1994 Aug; 15(4):244-6. PubMed ID: 7956265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bias in double-blind trials.
    Gøtzsche PC
    Dan Med Bull; 1990 Aug; 37(4):329-36. PubMed ID: 2245657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interim analyses and publication of clinical trials.
    Paykel ES
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1986 Jun; 43(6):613-4. PubMed ID: 3707291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Blinding or masking.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Mar; 141(3):389-390. PubMed ID: 22381501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to read a scientific paper.
    Hogan C
    GMHC Treat Issues; 2001 Jun; 15(6):8-11. PubMed ID: 11548666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [New guidelines for better documentation of survey methodology and results].
    Lindstedt G; Eliasson M
    Lakartidningen; 2005 Mar 7-13; 102(10):748, 750, 752-3. PubMed ID: 15839166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical management of data in clinical research.
    Fleiss JL; Kingman A
    Crit Rev Oral Biol Med; 1990; 1(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 2101261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial in orthopaedic surgery.
    Maffulli N
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Jun; 80(6):923. PubMed ID: 9655110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient bias, investigator bias and the double-masked procedure in clinical trials.
    Ederer F
    Am J Med; 1975 Mar; 58(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 1090156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Masking or blinding? An unscientific survey of mostly medical journal editors on the great debate.
    Lang T
    MedGenMed; 2000 Mar; 2(1):E25. PubMed ID: 11104471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review of five cardiology journals found that observer variability of measured variables was infrequently reported.
    Gow RM; Barrowman NJ; Lai L; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 18313565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is your 'double-blind' design truly double-blind?
    Oxtoby A; Jones A; Robinson M
    Br J Psychiatry; 1989 Nov; 155():700-1. PubMed ID: 2611601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing clinical trials- double-blind trials.
    Gore SM
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1981 Jul; 283(6284):122-4. PubMed ID: 6789934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Placebo controlled double blind trials.
    Friedman L; Passamani E; May G; Furberg C; Friedewald W
    Lancet; 1980 Jul; 2(8186):147-8. PubMed ID: 6105316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Actual medication versus therapist guesses: in a blind study, how blind is blind?
    Munjack DJ; Brown RA; McDowell D; Palmer R
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1989 Apr; 9(2):148-9. PubMed ID: 2723134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Observer bias in acellular pertussis vaccine trials.
    Wirsing von König CH; Schmitt HJ; Neiss A
    Pediatrics; 1999 Sep; 104(3 Pt 1):577-8. PubMed ID: 10515769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Double-blind assessment of therapeutic efficacy in clinical trials.
    Cohen S
    Dig Dis Sci; 1983 Jun; 28(6):564-5. PubMed ID: 6861586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.