These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16575369)

  • 1. [About: "Decision-to-deliver interval for forceps delivery and cesarean section"(J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, n 8-2005)].
    Schaal JP
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2006 Apr; 35(2):195-6. PubMed ID: 16575369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Decision-to-deliver interval for forceps delivery and cesarean section: 137 extractions for abnormal fetal heart rhythm during labor].
    Dupuis O; Dubuisson J; Moreau R; Sayegh I; Clément HJ; Rudigoz RC
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2005 Dec; 34(8):789-94. PubMed ID: 16319770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [DELIVERY BY OBSTETRICAL VENTOUSE IN SAIGON. ITS PLACE BESIDE FORCEPS AND CESAREAN SECTION].
    GOURILLON H
    Med Trop (Mars); 1964; 24():71-6. PubMed ID: 14142044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does epidural analgesia prolong labor and increase risk of cesarean delivery? A natural experiment.
    Zhang J; Yancey MK; Klebanoff MA; Schwarz J; Schweitzer D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jul; 185(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 11483916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Operative and assisted delivery.
    Robertson P
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Dec; 3(6):769-72. PubMed ID: 1818713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Choosing between bad, worse and worst: what is the preferred mode of delivery for failure of the second stage of labor?
    Hendler I; Kirshenbaum M; Barg M; Kees S; Mazaki-Tovi S; Moran O; Kalter A; Schiff E
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Aug; 30(15):1861-1864. PubMed ID: 27550831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forceps and vacuum extraction.
    Chamberlain G
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1980 Dec; 7(3):511-27. PubMed ID: 7011647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Management of the obstetric patient with a previous cesarean section. Analysis of 1,527 cases].
    García Luna AM; Ramírez Perea D; Alvarado Durán A
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1979 Mar; 45(269):223-42. PubMed ID: 540769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [About: "Evaluation of cesarean rate" by P. Rozenberg (J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2004; 33: 279-89)].
    Rudigoz RC
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2004 Sep; 33(5):451-2. PubMed ID: 15480287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of obstetrical procedures in the care of low-risk women.
    Adams JL
    Women Health; 1983; 8(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 6868624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early and late intraventricular hemorrhage: the role of obstetric factors.
    Shaver DC; Bada HS; Korones SB; Anderson GD; Wong SP; Arheart KL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Nov; 80(5):831-7. PubMed ID: 1407923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Current and shifting statistics on breech delivery at the Liège University Maternity Center].
    Vigis J; Thoumsin HJ; Oosterbosch J; Lambotte R
    Rev Med Liege; 1984 Dec; 39(24):873-8. PubMed ID: 6528147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Re: Lédée et al. Management in intractable obstetric haemorrhage: an audit study on 61 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001;94:189-96.
    Mousa HA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2001 Dec; 100(1):116-7. PubMed ID: 11728673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Risks of delivery for the child and their prevention].
    SOMMER KH
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1962 Sep; 56():948-50. PubMed ID: 13978188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comment on Spallicci et al. "Use of hyaluronidase for cervical ripening: a randomized trial" [Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 130 (1) (2007) 46-50].
    Marasinghe JP; Kaluararchchi A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Feb; 142(2):164; author reply 164-5. PubMed ID: 19124188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of blood loss during cesarean section and during vaginal delivery with episiotomy].
    Sarfati R; Maréchaud M; Magnin G
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1999 Feb; 28(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 10394516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Methods of delivery in patients with previous cesarean section at the Obstetrical and Gynecological Clinic of Perugia in the 5-year period 1972--1976].
    Gerli M; Gilardi G; Giannone E; Ballerani M
    Minerva Ginecol; 1978 Nov; 30(11):989-92. PubMed ID: 733112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Management of persistent posterior occipital presentation. 253 extractions by forceps].
    Palaric JC; Bourgeois-Dujols P; Jacquemard F; Poulain P; Grall JY; Giraud JR
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1991; 20(5):723-8. PubMed ID: 1955670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dual influences of age and obstetric history on fecal continence in parous women.
    Eogan M; O'Brien C; Daly L; Behan M; O'Connell PR; O'Herlihy C
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Feb; 112(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 21078512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of delivery options for second-stage events.
    Bailit JL; Grobman WA; Rice MM; Wapner RJ; Reddy UM; Varner MW; Thorp JM; Caritis SN; Iams JD; Saade G; Rouse DJ; Tolosa JE;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 214(5):638.e1-638.e10. PubMed ID: 26596236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.