These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16578913)
1. Abortion issue moves to states: shift on federal bench spurs governors, legislators to battle Roe. Solomon D Wall St J (East Ed); 2006 Mar; ():A4. PubMed ID: 16578913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states. Bradford CS Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A world without Roe: how different would it be? Glendon MA Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 2745061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation. Van Detta JA South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Parental notification and a minor's right to an abortion after Hodgson and Akron II. Graziano SG Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1991; 17(3):581-97. PubMed ID: 16145809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Stone AJ Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation. Moses MF Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Public support for pro-choice abortion policies in the nation and states: changes and stability after the Roe and Doe decisions. Uslaner EM; Weber RE Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1772-89. PubMed ID: 10245971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. South Dakota's abortion script--threatening the physician-patient relationship. Lazzarini Z N Engl J Med; 2008 Nov; 359(21):2189-91. PubMed ID: 19020321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test. Burdick R Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Family law I: abortion. Koscs ME Annu Surv Am Law; 1984; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker and Hurwitz in the deck and defrocked. Lucas R Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 May; 30(4):641-70. PubMed ID: 15237509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases. Guggenheim M Hofstra Law Rev; 2002; 30(3):589-646. PubMed ID: 15212070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. When the shouting has to stop: America and abortion. Economist; 1992 Apr; 323(7756):15-6. PubMed ID: 16001469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Worst choice: why we'd be better off without Roe. Rosen J New Repub; 2003 Feb; 228(7):15-6, 18. PubMed ID: 12769107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion wars, once again. The case being argued this week before the Supreme Court may determine just how far state restrictions can go. Halloran L US News World Rep; 2005 Dec; 139(21):29-30. PubMed ID: 16389673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The legal status of abortion in the states if Roe v. Wade is overruled. Linton PB Issues Law Med; 2007; 23(1):3-43. PubMed ID: 17703698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart. Borgmann CE Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In new court, Roe may stand, so foes look to limit its scope. Toner R; Liptak A N Y Times Web; 2005 Jul; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 16060018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]