These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16578917)

  • 1. The Scientific Misconduct Questionnaire--Revised (SMQ-R): validation and psychometric testing.
    Broome ME; Pryor E; Habermann B; Pulley L; Kincaid H
    Account Res; 2005; 12(4):263-80. PubMed ID: 16578917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientific misconduct from the perspective of research coordinators: a national survey.
    Pryor ER; Habermann B; Broome ME
    J Med Ethics; 2007 Jun; 33(6):365-9. PubMed ID: 17526690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country.
    Okonta PI; Rossouw T
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Mar; 15():25. PubMed ID: 24666413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survey of Dutch doctors finds evidence of widespread research misconduct.
    Sheldon T
    BMJ; 2012 Apr; 344():e2898. PubMed ID: 22522820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Many scientists admit to misconduct: degrees of deception vary in poll; researchers say findings could hurt the field.
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 2005 Jun; ():A3. PubMed ID: 15981403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repairing research integrity.
    Titus SL; Wells JA; Rhoades LJ
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):980-2. PubMed ID: 18563131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the seriousness of research misconduct: considerations for sanction assignment.
    Keranen L
    Account Res; 2006; 13(2):179-205. PubMed ID: 16830407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating the Reliability and Factor Structure of Kalichman's "Survey 2: Research Misconduct" Questionnaire: A Post Hoc Analysis Among Biomedical Doctoral Students in Scandinavia.
    Holm S; Hofmann B
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Oct; 12(4):199-205. PubMed ID: 28707501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of culture in research misconduct.
    Davis MS
    Account Res; 2003; 10(3):189-201. PubMed ID: 14979320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Research misconduct and crime lessons from criminal science on preventing misconduct and promoting integrity.
    Adams D; Pimple KD
    Account Res; 2005; 12(3):225-40. PubMed ID: 16634173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Dishonesty in medical research. A questionnaire study among project administrators in Health Region 4].
    Hals A; Jacobsen G
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Oct; 113(25):3149-52. PubMed ID: 8273040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Publication misconduct: Perceptions of participants of a faculty development programme.
    Singh SP; Dhir SK; Sharma M; Singh T
    Natl Med J India; 2018; 31(3):169-171. PubMed ID: 31044767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Misconduct in medical research. A questionnaire survey among project leaders in health region 4].
    Hals A; Jacobsen G
    Nord Med; 1994; 109(3):85-8. PubMed ID: 8139903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists.
    Tijdink JK; Verbeke R; Smulders YM
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):64-71. PubMed ID: 25747691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethics and fraud in science: a review of scientific misconduct and applications to craniofacial research.
    Eliades T; Athanasiou AE; Papadopulos JS
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 16164106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mundane misdeeds skew findings, researchers say.
    Dean C
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Jun; ():F6. PubMed ID: 15966122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Difference in scientists' discourse about scientific fraud and impropriety.
    John ID
    Aust Psychol; 1991 Jul; 26(2):120-2. PubMed ID: 16134264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new approach to assessing ethical conduct in scientific work.
    Helton-Fauth W; Gaddis B; Scott G; Mumford M; Devenport L; Connelly S; Brown R
    Account Res; 2003; 10(4):205-28. PubMed ID: 14989284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrity in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review of Studies in China.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Aug; 25(4):1271-1301. PubMed ID: 29721845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fraud, misconduct or normal science in medical research--an empirical study of demarcation.
    Lynöe N; Jacobsson L; Lundgren E
    J Med Ethics; 1999 Dec; 25(6):501-6. PubMed ID: 10635506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.