These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16578917)
21. Perceptions of Chinese Biomedical Researchers Towards Academic Misconduct: A Comparison Between 2015 and 2010. Liao QJ; Zhang YY; Fan YC; Zheng MH; Bai Y; Eslick GD; He XX; Zhang SB; Xia HH; He H Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):629-645. PubMed ID: 28397174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Scientific dishonesty--questionnaire to doctoral students in Sweden. Nilstun T; Löfmark R; Lundqvist A J Med Ethics; 2010 May; 36(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 20439329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Relationship among factors affecting research misconduct in medical sciences in Iran. Mardani A; Nakhoda M; Shamsi Gooshki E Account Res; 2020 Oct; 27(7):417-443. PubMed ID: 32544348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The scientific community perspective on research integrity. Teich AH Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):117-22. PubMed ID: 11652291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Psychometric properties of Persian version of the research misconduct questionnaire (PRMQ). Shamsoddin E; Janani L; Ghamari K; Kabiri P; Shamsi Gooshki E; Mesgarpour B J Med Ethics Hist Med; 2020; 13():18. PubMed ID: 33552451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Education and penalties are key to tackling misconduct. Wang K Nature; 2005 Aug; 436(7051):626. PubMed ID: 16079819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Overflow in science and its implications for trust. Siebert S; Machesky LM; Insall RH Elife; 2015 Sep; 4():. PubMed ID: 26365552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Misconduct in clinical scientific investigations]. De Broe ME Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2004; 66(5-6):335-41. PubMed ID: 15641564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Medical school guidelines for investigating misconduct and fraud in science. Annau Z Account Res; 1992; 2(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 11653980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Development and validation of a new questionnaire for the assessment of subjective physical performance in adult patients with haemophilia--the HEP-Test-Q. von Mackensen S; Czepa D; Herbsleb M; Hilberg T Haemophilia; 2010 Jan; 16(1):170-8. PubMed ID: 19845778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity. Fanelli D; Costas R; Larivière V PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0127556. PubMed ID: 26083381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Human cloning and scientific corruption: the South Korea scandal and the future of the stem cell debate. New Atlantis; 2006; 11():113-7. PubMed ID: 16789313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct. Sovacool BK Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Under a microscope: high-profile cases bring new scrutiny to science's superstars. Rosenthal E N Y Times Web; 2005 Dec; ():A6. PubMed ID: 16450467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]