These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16579822)

  • 21. Causal conclusions are most sensitive to unobserved binary covariates.
    Wang L; Krieger AM
    Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(13):2257-71. PubMed ID: 16220480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does a dose-response relationship reduce sensitivity to hidden bias?
    Rosenbaum PR
    Biostatistics; 2003 Jan; 4(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 12925326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical trials methodology: randomization, intent-to-treat, and random-effects regression.
    Atkins DC
    Depress Anxiety; 2009; 26(8):697-700. PubMed ID: 19658122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How do we know what we know? The randomized controlled trial revisited.
    Heaney RP
    J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Feb; 6(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 2028831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Metaanalyses are observational studies: how lack of randomization impacts analysis.
    Kaizar EE
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Jun; 100(6):1233-6. PubMed ID: 15929750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of study design on outcome after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. A comparison between the randomized controlled DREAM-trial and the observational EUROSTAR-registry.
    Leurs LJ; Buth J; Harris PL; Blankensteijn JD
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 Feb; 33(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 17097901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Controversy over "contradiction": Should randomized trials always trump observational studies?
    Fletcher AE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 147(3):384-6. PubMed ID: 19217953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of data analysis strategies for intent-to-treat analysis in pre-test-post-test designs with substantial dropout rates.
    Salim A; Mackinnon A; Christensen H; Griffiths K
    Psychiatry Res; 2008 Sep; 160(3):335-45. PubMed ID: 18718673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. From randomized controlled trials to observational studies.
    Silverman SL
    Am J Med; 2009 Feb; 122(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 19185083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessing the validity of clinical trials.
    Akobeng AK
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2008 Sep; 47(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18728521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Addressing the issue of channeling bias in observational studies with propensity scores analysis.
    Lobo FS; Wagner S; Gross CR; Schommer JC
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Mar; 2(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17138506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparing outcomes on peritoneal and hemodialysis: a case study in the interpretation of observational studies.
    Davies SJ
    Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2007 Mar; 18(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 17237887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Studies should be controlled, randomized, and blinded.
    Parker RA
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2009 May; 85(5):461-3. PubMed ID: 19381148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quantitative assessment of unobserved confounding is mandatory in nonrandomized intervention studies.
    Groenwold RH; Hak E; Hoes AW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 18619797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
    Pildal J; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Hilden J; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):847-57. PubMed ID: 17517809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The sound and the fury: was it all worth it?
    Hoover RN
    Epidemiology; 2008 Nov; 19(6):780-2; discussion 789-93. PubMed ID: 18813016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. RCTs and observational studies to determine the effect of prophylaxis in severe haemophilia.
    Fischer K; Grobbee DE; van den Berg HM
    Haemophilia; 2007 Jul; 13(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 17610546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. New strategies are needed to improve the accuracy of influenza vaccine effectiveness estimates among seniors.
    Nelson JC; Jackson ML; Weiss NS; Jackson LA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 62(7):687-94. PubMed ID: 19124221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Case-only analysis of treatment-covariate interactions in clinical trials.
    Vittinghoff E; Bauer DC
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):769-76. PubMed ID: 16984319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Investigations using clinical data registries: observational studies and risk adjustment.
    Hall BL; Bilimoria KY; Ko CY
    Surgery; 2009 Jun; 145(6):602-10. PubMed ID: 19486759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.