126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16580069)
1. Predictive abilities of numerical sediment quality guidelines in Sydney Harbour, Australia, and vicinity.
McCready S; Birch GF; Long ER; Spyrakis G; Greely CR
Environ Int; 2006 Jul; 32(5):638-49. PubMed ID: 16580069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An evaluation of Australian sediment quality guidelines.
McCready S; Birch GF; Long ER; Spyrakis G; Greely CR
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2006 Apr; 50(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 16435089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of sediment quality guidelines in the assessment and management of contaminated surficial sediments in Port Jackson (Sydney Harbour), Australia.
Birch GF; Taylor SE
Environ Manage; 2002 Jun; 29(6):860-70. PubMed ID: 11992176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Metallic and organic contaminants in sediments of Sydney Harbour, Australia and vicinity-- a chemical dataset for evaluating sediment quality guidelines.
McCready S; Birch GF; Long ER
Environ Int; 2006 May; 32(4):455-65. PubMed ID: 16337000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in SEM-AVS and ERM-ERL predictions of sediment impacts from metals in two US Virgin Islands marinas.
Hinkey LM; Zaidi BR
Mar Pollut Bull; 2007 Feb; 54(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 17064737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of national and regional sediment quality guidelines for classifying sediment toxicity in California.
Bay SM; Ritter KJ; Vidal-Dorsch DE; Field LJ
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Oct; 8(4):597-609. PubMed ID: 22730345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Critical evaluation of the sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls.
Beckert DS; Ginn TC
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Apr; 4(2):156-70. PubMed ID: 17994918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictions of sediment toxicity using consensus-based freshwater sediment quality guidelines.
Ingersoll CG; MacDonald DD; Wang N; Crane JL; Field LJ; Haverland PS; Kemble NE; Lindskoog RA; Severn C; Smorong DE
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2001 Jul; 41(1):8-21. PubMed ID: 11385586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of numerical sediment quality targets for the St. Louis River Area of Concern.
Crane JL; MacDonald DD; Ingersoll CG; Smorong DE; Lindskoog RA; Severn CG; Berger TA; Field LJ
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2002 Jul; 43(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 12045868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Toxicity of surficial sediments from Sydney Harbour and vicinity, Australia.
McCready S; Spyrakis G; Greely CR; Birch GF; Long ER
Environ Monit Assess; 2004; 96(1-3):53-83. PubMed ID: 15327149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and evaluation of sediment quality guidelines based on benthic macrofauna responses.
Ritter KJ; Bay SM; Smith RW; Vidal-Dorsch DE; Field LJ
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Oct; 8(4):610-24. PubMed ID: 22275113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting metal toxicity in sediments: a critique of current approaches.
Simpson SL; Batley GE
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Jan; 3(1):18-31. PubMed ID: 17283593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of metals in sediments from Lake Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia, using normalisation models and sediment quality guidelines.
Roach AC
Mar Environ Res; 2005 Jun; 59(5):453-72. PubMed ID: 15603769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Baseline ecological risk assessment of the Calcasieu Estuary, Louisiana: Part 2. An evaluation of the predictive ability of effects-based sediment-quality guidelines.
MacDonald DD; Ingersoll CG; Smorong DE; Sinclair JA; Lindskoog R; Wang N; Severn C; Gouguet R; Meyer J; Field J
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2011 Jul; 61(1):14-28. PubMed ID: 21442249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acute marine sediment toxicity: a potential new test with the amphipod Gammarus locusta.
Costa FO; Correia AD; Costa MH
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1998; 40(1-2):81-7. PubMed ID: 9626540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficiency of sediment quality guidelines for predicting toxicity: the case of the St. Lawrence River.
Desrosiers M; Babut MP; Pelletier M; Bélanger C; Thibodeau S; Martel L
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Apr; 6(2):225-39. PubMed ID: 20821687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of sediment quality guidelines for toxicity assessment in the Sunderban wetlands (Bay of Bengal, India).
Binelli A; Sarkar SK; Chatterjee M; Riva C; Parolini M; Bhattacharya Bd; Bhattacharya AK; Satpathy KK
Chemosphere; 2008 Oct; 73(7):1129-37. PubMed ID: 18718633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitivity of an indigenous amphipod (Corophium colo) to chemical contaminants in laboratory toxicity tests conducted with sediments from Sydney Harbor, Australia, and vicinity.
McCready S; Greely CR; Hyne RV; Birch GF; Long ER
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2005 Oct; 24(10):2545-52. PubMed ID: 16268156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationships between toxicity and concentrations of chemical contaminants in sediments from Sydney Harbour, Australia, and vicinity.
McCready S; Birch GF; Long ER; Spyrakis G; Greely CR
Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Sep; 120(1-3):187-220. PubMed ID: 16773229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of acute and chronic toxicity methods for marine sediments.
Kennedy AJ; Steevens JA; Lotufo GR; Farrar JD; Reiss MR; Kropp RK; Doi J; Bridges TS
Mar Environ Res; 2009 Sep; 68(3):118-27. PubMed ID: 19481793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
