BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16580124)

  • 1. Aggregating high-priority landscape areas to the parcel level: an easement implementation tool.
    Strager MP; Rosenberger RS
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(2):290-8. PubMed ID: 16580124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the ecological and social benefits of private land conservation in Colorado.
    Wallace GN; Theobald DM; Ernst T; King K
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):284-96. PubMed ID: 18402582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coupled ecological-social dynamics in a forested landscape: spatial interactions and information flow.
    Satake A; Leslie HM; Iwasa Y; Levin SA
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jun; 246(4):695-707. PubMed ID: 17376488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Landscape ecological assessment: a tool for integrating biodiversity issues in strategic environmental assessment and planning.
    Mörtberg UM; Balfors B; Knol WC
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Mar; 82(4):457-70. PubMed ID: 16574306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem function through limited development: an empirical evaluation.
    Milder JC; Lassoie JP; Bedford BL
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Feb; 22(1):70-9. PubMed ID: 18254854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ecological networks as conceptual frameworks or operational tools in conservation.
    Boitani L; Falcucci A; Maiorano L; Rondinini C
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1414-22. PubMed ID: 18173465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aligning conservation priorities across taxa in Madagascar with high-resolution planning tools.
    Kremen C; Cameron A; Moilanen A; Phillips SJ; Thomas CD; Beentje H; Dransfield J; Fisher BL; Glaw F; Good TC; Harper GJ; Hijmans RJ; Lees DC; Louis E; Nussbaum RA; Raxworthy CJ; Razafimpahanana A; Schatz GE; Vences M; Vieites DR; Wright PC; Zjhra ML
    Science; 2008 Apr; 320(5873):222-6. PubMed ID: 18403708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficiency and concordance of alternative methods for minimizing opportunity costs in conservation planning.
    Cameron SE; Williams KJ; Mitchell DK
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):886-96. PubMed ID: 18637906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating the value of non-use benefits from small changes in the provision of ecosystem services.
    Dutton A; Edwards-Jones G; Macdonald DW
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Dec; 24(6):1479-87. PubMed ID: 20560999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conservation planning in forest landscapes of Fennoscandia and an approach to the challenge of countdown 2010.
    Mikusiński G; Pressey RL; Edenius L; Kujala H; Moilanen A; Niemelä J; Ranius T
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1445-54. PubMed ID: 18173468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of inverse spatial conservation prioritization to avoid biological diversity loss outside protected areas.
    Kareksela S; Moilanen A; Tuominen S; Kotiaho JS
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1294-303. PubMed ID: 24033397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A hybrid scheme for comparing the effects of bird diversity conservation approaches on landscape patterns and biodiversity in the Shangan sub-watershed in Taiwan.
    Wu CF; Lin YP; Lin SH
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Jul; 92(7):1809-20. PubMed ID: 21450396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conservation planning with multiple organizations and objectives.
    Bode M; Probert W; Turner WR; Wilson KA; Venter O
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Apr; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 21129029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Local land-use planning to conserve biodiversity: planners' perspectives on what works.
    Stokes DL; Hanson MF; Oaks DD; Straub JE; Ponio AV
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):450-60. PubMed ID: 19906063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Designing cost-effective payments for conservation measures to generate spatiotemporal habitat heterogeneity.
    Drechsler M; Johst K; Ohl C; Wätzold F
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1475-86. PubMed ID: 18173471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mapping human and social dimensions of conservation opportunity for the scheduling of conservation action on private land.
    Knight AT; Cowling RM; Difford M; Campbell BM
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1348-58. PubMed ID: 20345404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating biodiversity trajectories using scenarios--lessons from two contrasting agricultural landscapes.
    Lindborg R; Stenseke M; Cousins SA; Bengtsson J; Berg A; Gustafsson T; Sjödin NE; Eriksson O
    J Environ Manage; 2009; 91(2):499-508. PubMed ID: 19853368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identifying priority areas for ecosystem service management in South African grasslands.
    Egoh BN; Reyers B; Rouget M; Richardson DM
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Jun; 92(6):1642-50. PubMed ID: 21334134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conservation easements: biodiversity protection and private use.
    Rissman AR; Lozier L; Comendant T; Kareiva P; Kiesecker JM; Shaw MR; Merenlender AM
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Jun; 21(3):709-18. PubMed ID: 17531049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The grain of spatially referenced economic cost and biodiversity benefit data and the effectiveness of a cost targeting strategy.
    Sutton NJ; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1451-61. PubMed ID: 25381868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.