175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1658099)
1. The effect of partial coating with hydroxyapatite on bone remodeling in relation to porous-coated titanium-alloy dental implants in the dog.
Pilliar RM; Deporter DA; Watson PA; Pharoah M; Chipman M; Valiquette N; Carter S; De Groot K
J Dent Res; 1991 Oct; 70(10):1338-45. PubMed ID: 1658099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Finite element analysis of crestal bone loss around porous-coated dental implants.
Vaillancourt H; Pilliar RM; McCammond D
J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(4):267-82. PubMed ID: 8589512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hydroxyapatite-coating on titanium arc sprayed titanium implants.
Nakashima Y; Hayashi K; Inadome T; Uenoyama K; Hara T; Kanemaru T; Sugioka Y; Noda I
J Biomed Mater Res; 1997 Jun; 35(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 9138063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. I. Radiographic analysis.
Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Nummikoski PV; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
J Periodontol; 1997 Mar; 68(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 9100194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. II. Histologic analysis.
Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):933-49. PubMed ID: 9358360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of tissue reaction and osteointegration of metal implants between hydroxyapatite/Ti alloy coat: an animal experimental study.
Itiravivong P; Promasa A; Laiprasert T; Techapongworachai T; Kuptniratsaikul S; Thanakit V; Heimann RB
J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Jun; 86 Suppl 2():S422-31. PubMed ID: 12930020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hot isostatic pressing-processed hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants: light microscopic and scanning electron microscopy investigations.
Wie H; Herø H; Solheim T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):837-44. PubMed ID: 9857595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo evaluation of CSTi dental implants in the presence of ligature-induced peri-implantitis.
Cook SD; Rust-Dawicki AM
J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 8699512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of alendronate in peri-implant defect regeneration.
Meraw SJ; Reeve CM; Wollan PC
J Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 70(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 10102552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences between the bony interfaces of titanium and hydroxyapatite-alumina plasma-sprayed titanium blade implants.
Morimoto K; Kihara A; Takeshita F; Akedo H; Suetsugu T
J Oral Implantol; 1988; 14(3):314-24. PubMed ID: 2855931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hydroxyapatite ceramic coating for bone implant fixation. Mechanical and histological studies in dogs.
Søballe K
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 1993; 255():1-58. PubMed ID: 8237337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vivo evaluation of bioactive glass-based coatings on dental implants in a dog implantation model.
van Oirschot BA; Alghamdi HS; Närhi TO; Anil S; Al Farraj Aldosari A; van den Beucken JJ; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 23078340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictable crestal bone remodelling around two porous-coated titanium alloy dental implant designs. A radiographic study in dogs.
al-Sayyed A; Deporter DA; Pilliar RM; Watson PA; Pharoah M; Berhane K; Carter S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Sep; 5(3):131-41. PubMed ID: 7827227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone reaction adjacent to microplasma-sprayed calcium phosphate-coated oral implants subjected to an occlusal load, an experimental study in the dog.
Junker R; Manders PJ; Wolke J; Borisov Y; Braceras I; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Feb; 22(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 21070381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The advantages of coated titanium implants prepared by radiofrequency sputtering from hydroxyapatite.
Cooley DR; Van Dellen AF; Burgess JO; Windeler AS
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jan; 67(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 1312597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hydroxyapatite coating modifies implant membrane formation. Controlled micromotion studied in dogs.
Søballe K; Brockstedt-Rasmussen H; Hansen ES; Bünger C
Acta Orthop Scand; 1992 Apr; 63(2):128-40. PubMed ID: 1590045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of hydroxyapatite on bone formation around exposed heads of titanium implants in rabbits.
Donohue WB; Mascrès C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1990 Nov; 48(11):1196-200. PubMed ID: 2170605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Guided bone regeneration around titanium plasma-sprayed, acid-etched, and hydroxyapatite-coated implants in the canine model.
Conner KA; Sabatini R; Mealey BL; Takacs VJ; Mills MP; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2003 May; 74(5):658-68. PubMed ID: 12816298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative clinical study of three different endosseous implants in edentulous mandibles.
Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Støvne S; Haanaes HR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 9714956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
