181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16581451)
21. Suture strength and angle of load application in a suture anchor eyelet.
Deakin M; Stubbs D; Bruce W; Goldberg J; Gillies RM; Walsh WR
Arthroscopy; 2005 Dec; 21(12):1447-51. PubMed ID: 16376233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. All-inside meniscal repair devices compared with their matched inside-out vertical mattress suture repair: introducing 10,000 and 100,000 loading cycles.
Rosso C; Müller S; Buckland DM; Schwenk T; Zimmermann S; de Wild M; Valderrabano V
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Sep; 42(9):2226-33. PubMed ID: 24966304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of all-inside meniscal repair devices with matched inside-out suture repair.
Rosso C; Kovtun K; Dow W; McKenzie B; Nazarian A; DeAngelis JP; Ramappa AJ
Am J Sports Med; 2011 Dec; 39(12):2634-9. PubMed ID: 21997730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Tensile and shear loading stability of all-inside meniscal repairs: an in vitro biomechanical evaluation.
Brucker PU; Favre P; Puskas GJ; von Campe A; Meyer DC; Koch PP
Am J Sports Med; 2010 Sep; 38(9):1838-44. PubMed ID: 20805413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Meniscal repair using large diameter horizontal sutures increases fixation strength: an in vitro study.
Kocabey Y; Taşer O; Hapa O; Güçlü A; Bozdag E; Sünbüloglu E; Doral M
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2011 Feb; 19(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 20602087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Shear force at failure and stiffness of all-inside meniscal repair devices.
Kesto WK; Esquivel AO; Markel DC
J Knee Surg; 2013 Dec; 26(6):435-40. PubMed ID: 23729312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Medial Meniscal Root Avulsion: A Biomechanical Comparison of 4 Different Repair Constructs.
Mitchell R; Pitts R; Kim YM; Matava MJ
Arthroscopy; 2016 Jan; 32(1):111-9. PubMed ID: 26422709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pull-out and shear failure strengths of arthroscopic meniscal repair systems.
Fisher SR; Markel DC; Koman JD; Atkinson TS
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2002 Sep; 10(5):294-9. PubMed ID: 12355304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A biomechanical comparison of the Mitek RapidLoc, Mitek Meniscal repair system, clearfix screws and vertical PDS and Ti-Cron sutures.
Naqui SZ; Thiryayi WA; Hopgood P; Ryan WG
Knee; 2006 Mar; 13(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 16338137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomechanical comparison of knotless anchor repair versus simple suture repair for type II SLAP lesions.
Uggen C; Wei A; Glousman RE; ElAttrache N; Tibone JE; McGarry MH; Lee TQ
Arthroscopy; 2009 Oct; 25(10):1085-92. PubMed ID: 19801286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of the effects of radiofrequency treatment and mechanical shaving for meniscectomy.
Grana WA; Szivek JA; Schnepp AB; Ramos R
Arthroscopy; 2006 Aug; 22(8):884-8. PubMed ID: 16904588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Abrasion resistance of two types of nonabsorbable braided suture.
Lo IK; Burkhart SS; Athanasiou K
Arthroscopy; 2004 Apr; 20(4):407-13. PubMed ID: 15067281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Horizontal suture placement influences meniscal repair fixation strength.
Kocabey Y; Taser O; Nyland J; Ince H; Sahin F; Sunbuloglu E; Baysal G
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2013 Mar; 21(3):615-9. PubMed ID: 22484371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanical evaluation of an all-inside suture-based device for repairing longitudinal meniscal tears.
Masoudi A; Beamer BS; Harlow ER; Manoukian OS; Walley KC; Hertz B; Haeussler C; Olson JJ; Zurakowski D; Nazarian A; Ramappa AJ; DeAngelis JP
Arthroscopy; 2015 Mar; 31(3):428-34. PubMed ID: 25442653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomechanical investigations of different meniscal repair implants in comparison with horizontal sutures on human meniscus.
Becker R; Schröder M; Stärke C; Urbach D; Nebelung W
Arthroscopy; 2001 May; 17(5):439-44. PubMed ID: 11337709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Biomechanical Performance of the Latest All-Inside Meniscal Repair Devices.
Barber FA; Howard MS; Ashraf W; Spenciner DB
Arthroscopy; 2020 Dec; 36(12):3001-3007. PubMed ID: 32315765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pullout strength of meniscal repair after cyclic loading: comparison of vertical, horizontal, and oblique suture techniques.
Kocabey Y; Taser O; Nyland J; Doral MN; Demirhan M; Caborn DN; Sarban S
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2006 Oct; 14(10):998-1003. PubMed ID: 16673145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Meta-analysis on biomechanical properties of meniscus repairs: are devices better than sutures?
M Buckland D; Sadoghi P; Wimmer MD; Vavken P; Pagenstert GI; Valderrabano V; Rosso C
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2015 Jan; 23(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 24841938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Meniscal repair devices: a clinical and biomechanical literature review.
Farng E; Sherman O
Arthroscopy; 2004 Mar; 20(3):273-86. PubMed ID: 15007316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Flexor tendon repairs: the impact of fiberwire on grasping and locking core sutures.
Miller B; Dodds SD; deMars A; Zagoreas N; Waitayawinyu T; Trumble TE
J Hand Surg Am; 2007; 32(5):591-6. PubMed ID: 17481994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
