255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16581453)
1. A biomechanical comparison of the FasT-Fix meniscal repair suture system and the RapidLoc device in cadaver meniscus.
Kocabey Y; Chang HC; Brand JC; Nawab A; Nyland J; Caborn DN
Arthroscopy; 2006 Apr; 22(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 16581453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical testing of new meniscal repair techniques containing ultra high-molecular weight polyethylene suture.
Barber FA; Herbert MA; Schroeder FA; Aziz-Jacobo J; Sutker MJ
Arthroscopy; 2009 Sep; 25(9):959-67. PubMed ID: 19732633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Load to failure testing of new meniscal repair devices.
Barber FA; Herbert MA; Richards DP
Arthroscopy; 2004 Jan; 20(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 14716278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical testing of suture-based meniscal repair devices containing ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene suture: update 2011.
Barber FA; Herbert MA; Bava ED; Drew OR
Arthroscopy; 2012 Jun; 28(6):827-34. PubMed ID: 22317797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical evaluation of meniscal repair systems: a comparison of the Meniscal Viper Repair System, the vertical mattress FasT-Fix Device, and vertical mattress ethibond sutures.
Chang HC; Nyland J; Caborn DN; Burden R
Am J Sports Med; 2005 Dec; 33(12):1846-52. PubMed ID: 16157854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A cyclic testing comparison of FasT-Fix and RapidLoc devices in human cadaveric meniscus.
Nyland J; Chang H; Kocabey Y; Nawab A; Brand J; Caborn DN
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 May; 128(5):489-94. PubMed ID: 18094981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cyclic testing of flexible all-inside meniscus suture anchors: biomechanical analysis.
Zantop T; Eggers AK; Musahl V; Weimann A; Petersen W
Am J Sports Med; 2005 Mar; 33(3):388-94. PubMed ID: 15716254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repair of peripheral vertical meniscus lesions in porcine menisci: in vitro biomechanical testing of 3 different meniscus repair devices.
Lee YH; Nyland J; Burden R; Caborn DN
Am J Sports Med; 2013 May; 41(5):1074-81. PubMed ID: 23475943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A biomechanical comparison of the Mitek RapidLoc, Mitek Meniscal repair system, clearfix screws and vertical PDS and Ti-Cron sutures.
Naqui SZ; Thiryayi WA; Hopgood P; Ryan WG
Knee; 2006 Mar; 13(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 16338137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Biomechanical Performance of the Latest All-Inside Meniscal Repair Devices.
Barber FA; Howard MS; Ashraf W; Spenciner DB
Arthroscopy; 2020 Dec; 36(12):3001-3007. PubMed ID: 32315765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A biomechanical evaluation of all-inside 2-stitch meniscal repair devices with matched inside-out suture repair.
Ramappa AJ; Chen A; Hertz B; Wexler M; Grimaldi Bournissaint L; DeAngelis JP; Nazarian A
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Jan; 42(1):194-9. PubMed ID: 24114752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of the FasT-Fix meniscal repair suture system with vertical mattress sutures and meniscus arrows.
Borden P; Nyland J; Caborn DN; Pienkowski D
Am J Sports Med; 2003; 31(3):374-8. PubMed ID: 12750129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Initial fixation strength of flexible all-inside meniscus suture anchors in comparison to conventional suture technique and rigid anchors: biomechanical evaluation of new meniscus refixation systems.
Zantop T; Eggers AK; Weimann A; Hassenpflug J; Petersen W
Am J Sports Med; 2004 Jun; 32(4):863-9. PubMed ID: 15150031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cyclic testing of 3 all-inside meniscal repair devices: a biomechanical analysis.
Mehta VM; Terry MA
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Dec; 37(12):2435-9. PubMed ID: 19797615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical investigations of different meniscal repair implants in comparison with horizontal sutures on human meniscus.
Becker R; Schröder M; Stärke C; Urbach D; Nebelung W
Arthroscopy; 2001 May; 17(5):439-44. PubMed ID: 11337709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of lesion location on fixation strength of the meniscal viper repair system: an in vitro study using porcine menisci.
Chang HC; Caborn DN; Nyland J; Burden R
Arthroscopy; 2006 Apr; 22(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 16581451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vascular risk associated with meniscal repair using Rapidloc versus FasT-Fix: comparison of two all-inside meniscal devices.
Cohen SB; Boyd L; Miller MD
J Knee Surg; 2007 Jul; 20(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 17665787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of suture material on the strength of horizontal mattress suture configuration for meniscus repair.
Hapa O; Akşahin E; Erduran M; Davul S; Havitçioğlu H; LaPrade RF; Bozdağ E; Sünbüloğlu E
Knee; 2013 Dec; 20(6):577-80. PubMed ID: 23340094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Meta-analysis on biomechanical properties of meniscus repairs: are devices better than sutures?
M Buckland D; Sadoghi P; Wimmer MD; Vavken P; Pagenstert GI; Valderrabano V; Rosso C
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2015 Jan; 23(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 24841938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of an all-inside suture-based device for repairing longitudinal meniscal tears.
Masoudi A; Beamer BS; Harlow ER; Manoukian OS; Walley KC; Hertz B; Haeussler C; Olson JJ; Zurakowski D; Nazarian A; Ramappa AJ; DeAngelis JP
Arthroscopy; 2015 Mar; 31(3):428-34. PubMed ID: 25442653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
