These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16581719)

  • 1. Fads and foibles in ART: where is the evidence?
    Hartshorne GM; Baker H
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2006 Mar; 9(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 16581719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Continuous quality improvement and assisted reproductive technology multiple gestations: some progress, some answers, more questions.
    Gibbons W; Grainger D; Cedars M; Jain T; Klein N; Stern J;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):301-4. PubMed ID: 17693326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The assisted reproductive technology laboratory: toward evidence-based practice?
    Sunde A; Balaban B
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):310-8. PubMed ID: 23905707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correct coding for laboratory procedures during assisted reproductive technology cycles.
    Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Sep; 82 Suppl 1():S51-4. PubMed ID: 15363694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parthenogenetic activation: biology and applications in the ART laboratory.
    Paffoni A; Brevini TA; Gandolfi F; Ragni G
    Placenta; 2008 Oct; 29 Suppl B():121-5. PubMed ID: 18778853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):550-9. PubMed ID: 17303133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revised minimum standards for practices offering assisted reproductive technologies.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5 Suppl):S165-8. PubMed ID: 19007618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Challenges of the EU 'tissues and cells' directive.
    Hartshorne GM
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2005 Oct; 11(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 16274594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Critical appraisal of the Vienna consensus: performance indicators for assisted reproductive technology laboratories.
    Lopez-Regalado ML; Martínez-Granados L; González-Utor A; Ortiz N; Iglesias M; Ardoy M; Castilla JA;
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2018 Aug; 37(2):128-132. PubMed ID: 29857986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Parental imprinting related to Assisted Reproductive Technologies].
    Fauque P; Jouannet P; Jammes H
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Nov; 36(11):1139-46. PubMed ID: 18922729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient and tissue identification in the assisted reproductive technology laboratory.
    Pomeroy KO; Racowsky C
    Semin Reprod Med; 2012 Jun; 30(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 22585628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assisted reproductive technology, epigenetics, and long-term health: a developmental time bomb still ticking.
    Grace KS; Sinclair KD
    Semin Reprod Med; 2009 Sep; 27(5):409-16. PubMed ID: 19711251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Medically assisted procreation in France; current situation and future prospects].
    Jouannet P
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2008 Jan; 192(1):117-29; discussion 129-32. PubMed ID: 18663986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New perspectives in medically assisted procreation.
    Simon C
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2008 Sep; 24(9):485. PubMed ID: 18958765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Are French results in assisted reproductive techniques so bad?].
    Pouly JL; Larue L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jan; 35(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 17208496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality control in the ART laboratory: matters arising.
    Albertini DF
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Jul; 32(7):1007-8. PubMed ID: 26198139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Oocyte and embryo quality: do the apoptotic markers have a place in the preimplantation genetic diagnostic?].
    Haouzi D; De Vos J; Loup V; Assou S; Gasca S; Reyftmann L; Klein B; Hamamah S
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008; 36(7-8):730-42. PubMed ID: 18644743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blastocyst culture and transfer in clinical-assisted reproduction.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5 Suppl):S174-7. PubMed ID: 19007621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What next for assisted reproductive technology? A plea for an evidence-based approach.
    Van Steirteghem A
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Dec; 23(12):2615-6. PubMed ID: 19015132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Increasing success of assisted reproduction].
    Nau JY
    Rev Med Suisse; 2009 Jun; 5(207):1336. PubMed ID: 19626935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.