These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16581719)

  • 21. Correct coding for laboratory procedures during assisted reproductive technology cycles.
    Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Apr; 81(4):1168-71. PubMed ID: 15066499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Coming soon to your clinic: high-quality ART.
    van Empel IW; Nelen WL; Hermens RP; Kremer JA
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Jun; 23(6):1242-5. PubMed ID: 18372252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assisted reproductive technology: both sides now.
    Cheung AP
    J Reprod Med; 2006 Apr; 51(4):283-92. PubMed ID: 16739266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Methodological issues in infertility research.
    Daya S
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):779-97. PubMed ID: 17118261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The human embryo in vitro: recent progress.
    Geary S; Moon YS
    J Reprod Med; 2006 Apr; 51(4):293-302. PubMed ID: 16737025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Correct coding for laboratory procedures during assisted reproductive technology cycles.
    Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5 Suppl):S202-5. PubMed ID: 19007631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dutch translation of the ICMART-WHO revised glossary on ART terminology.
    De Neubourg D; van Duijnhoven NT; Nelen WL; D'Hooghe TM
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2012; 74(3):233-48. PubMed ID: 23146953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States.
    Stern JE; Cedars MI; Jain T; Klein NA; Beaird CM; Grainger DA; Gibbons WE;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 17445805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Safety, Efficacy, and Complexities in the ART Laboratory.
    Racowsky C; Carrell D
    Semin Reprod Med; 2012 Jun; 30(3):165-6. PubMed ID: 22585626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Assisted reproductive techniques (ART): the point of view of patients and their organizations].
    Prestel T; Meier-Oehlke A;
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Sep; 35(9):912-6. PubMed ID: 17728172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A formal comparison of the practice of assisted reproductive technologies between Europe and the USA.
    Gleicher N; Weghofer A; Barad D
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):1945-50. PubMed ID: 16690628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Molecular diagnosis in the ART laboratory: making it matter.
    Hillier SG
    Mol Hum Reprod; 2010 Aug; 16(8):511-2. PubMed ID: 20610615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quality management systems in ART: are they really needed? An Australian clinic's experience.
    Warnes GM; Norman RJ
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):41-55. PubMed ID: 17085076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assisted reproductive technologies in South Dakota: the first ten years.
    Brannian J; Hansen K
    S D Med; 2006 Jul; 59(7):291-3. PubMed ID: 16895051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. sHLA-G production by human IVF embryos: can it be measured reliably?
    Sargent I; Swales A; Ledee N; Kozma N; Tabiasco J; Le Bouteiller P
    J Reprod Immunol; 2007 Oct; 75(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 17482269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quality management in the ART laboratory.
    Kastrop PM
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2003 Dec; 7(6):691-4. PubMed ID: 14748969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of microorganisms in an assisted reproductive technology facility.
    Herlong JL; Reubish K; Higdon HL; Boone WR
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):847-53. PubMed ID: 17678906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Current status of the approach to assisted reproduction.
    Pauli SA; Berga SL; Shang W; Session DR
    Pediatr Clin North Am; 2009 Jun; 56(3):467-88, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 19501687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Current practices of oocyte donation in France and Europe].
    Letur H
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2007 Dec; 36(8):727-37. PubMed ID: 17850990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Correct coding for laboratory procedures during assisted reproductive technology cycles.
    Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5 Suppl 1):S168-71. PubMed ID: 17055815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.