377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16581966)
1. Author, author burning bright; author, author are you right?
Pederson T
FASEB J; 2006 Apr; 20(6):600. PubMed ID: 16581966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A simple system of checks and balances to cut fraud.
Yang X; Eggan K; Seidel G; Jaenisch R; Melton D
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782. PubMed ID: 16482128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethics and fraud.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):117-8. PubMed ID: 16407910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Research conduct. Lessons of the stem cell scandal.
Cho MK; McGee G; Magnus D
Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5761):614-5. PubMed ID: 16456065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Disgraced cloner's ally is cleared of misconduct.
Marris E; Check E
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):768-9. PubMed ID: 16482112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Korean scandal will have global fallout.
Check E; Cyranoski D
Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7071):1056-7. PubMed ID: 16371963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Author lists: specify who did what to aid assessment.
Vital MV
Nature; 2006 Sep; 443(7107):26. PubMed ID: 16957708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Each co-author should sign to reduce risk of fraud.
Yager K
Nature; 2007 Nov; 450(7170):610. PubMed ID: 18046378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Retraction ends furore over cancer vaccine.
Abbott A
Nature; 2003 Sep; 425(6953):4. PubMed ID: 12955102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Second thoughts on who goes where in author lists.
Laurance WF
Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7098):26. PubMed ID: 16823429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cash for papers: putting a premium on publication.
Fuyuno I; Cyranoski D
Nature; 2006 Jun; 441(7095):792. PubMed ID: 16778850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The taint of 'misbehavior'.
Guterman L
Chron High Educ; 2006 Feb; 52(25):A14-6. PubMed ID: 16786618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A silent scientist under fire.
Guterman L
Chron High Educ; 2006 Feb; 52(22):A15, A18-9. PubMed ID: 16789291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Chinese Academic Assessment and Incentive System.
Suo Q
Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Feb; 22(1):297-9. PubMed ID: 25794900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. University panel faults cloning co-author.
Wade N
N Y Times Web; 2006 Feb; ():A12. PubMed ID: 16514740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The trouble with replication.
Giles J
Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7101):344-7. PubMed ID: 16871184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Meyer: disagreements but no misconduct.
Vences M; Zardoya R
Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7008):505. PubMed ID: 15457231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. TV tests call into question cloner's stem-cell success.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7069):718. PubMed ID: 16340973
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The demise of the lone author.
Greene M
Nature; 2007 Dec; 450(7173):1165. PubMed ID: 18097387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry.
Abbott A; Schwarz J
Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):113. PubMed ID: 12110849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
