BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16581966)

  • 21. Standards for papers on cloning.
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):243. PubMed ID: 16421524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Who is accountable?
    Nature; 2007 Nov; 450(7166):1. PubMed ID: 17972835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Misconduct: the stars who fell to earth.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):728-9. PubMed ID: 12490902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Where now for stem-cell cloners?
    Check E
    Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7071):1058-9. PubMed ID: 16371964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Not being clear about authorship is lying and damages the scientific record.
    England C; Hodgkinson M; Tamber PS
    Natl Med J India; 2007; 20(2):56-8. PubMed ID: 17802982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Inappropriate authorship in collaborative science research.
    Pennock RT
    Public Aff Q; 1996 Oct; 10(4):379-93. PubMed ID: 11654653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
    Fox MF
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Scientific misconduct].
    Fernández del Castillo C
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2002 Jun; 70():261-2. PubMed ID: 12216540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Resolving authorship.
    Billingsley M
    Nursingconnections; 1993; 6(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 8133941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Next steps in the Schön affair.
    Kennedy D
    Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5593):495. PubMed ID: 12386303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Credit where credit's due.
    Nature; 2006 Mar; 440(7084):591-2. PubMed ID: 16572137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Scientific misconduct. Bell Labs fires star physicist found guilty of forging data.
    Service RF
    Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5591):30-1. PubMed ID: 12364753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
    Wittmaack K
    Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A suggestion for the multiple author issue.
    Raff H
    Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5642):55-7. PubMed ID: 14526060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Meyer case poses a challenge to the system.
    Málaga-Trillo E; Gerlach G
    Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7008):505. PubMed ID: 15457230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Authors are not criminals and editors should not be policemen.
    Jorgensen PM
    Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc; 2010; 19(3):193-5. PubMed ID: 21261211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Commentary: monitoring biological data.
    Kritchevsky D
    Account Res; 1990 Oct; 1(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 15991407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A reprogramming rush.
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7186):388. PubMed ID: 18368078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Research misconduct. Seoul National University dismisses Hwang.
    Wohn Y
    Science; 2006 Mar; 311(5768):1695. PubMed ID: 16556813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ghost writers in the sky.
    J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):809-10. PubMed ID: 18221969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.