214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16582108)
1. Can a 29% cesarean delivery rate possibly be justified?
Resnik R
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):752-4. PubMed ID: 16582108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Can a 29% cesarean delivery rate possibly be justified?
Harer WB
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):693. PubMed ID: 16946234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Should maternal choice be an indication for caesarean section?
Duckworth S
Int J Surg; 2008 Aug; 6(4):277-80. PubMed ID: 18178139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Marion's message: too many or not enough cesarean sections?
McLean MT
Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2007; (82):9. PubMed ID: 17725115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Mortality and fatalities after cesarean section in West Berlin 1975 to 1989].
Remy N; Jaluvka V; Weitzel HK
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1993; 115(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 8438632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The greatest health divide in the world--half million die in childbirth annually.
Beck DM
Beginnings; 2010; 30(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 20192010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Why women still die when giving birth?].
Erkkola R
Duodecim; 1997; 113(6):457-8. PubMed ID: 11370065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Every woman counts: reducing maternal mortality.
McIntyre H
Pract Midwife; 2010 May; 13(5):34-7. PubMed ID: 20481082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing complications in intended vaginal and caesarean deliveries.
Kor-Anantakul O; Suwanrath C; Lim A; Chongsuviwatwong V
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Jan; 28(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 18259902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maternal mortality in Finland 1970-89.
Erkkola R
Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl; 1994; 208():72-5. PubMed ID: 8092779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality obstetric trauma indicators valid measures of hospital safety?
Grobman WA; Feinglass J; Murthy S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):868-74. PubMed ID: 16949428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Between life and death.
Hall J
Pract Midwife; 2011 Mar; 14(3):37-9. PubMed ID: 21473327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Operative deliveries in low-risk pregnancies in The Netherlands: primary versus secondary care.
Maassen MS; Hendrix MJ; Van Vugt HC; Veersema S; Smits F; Nijhuis JG
Birth; 2008 Dec; 35(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 19036039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A hidden tragedy: birth as a human rights issue in developing countries.
Penwell V
Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2010; (94):9-10, 64. PubMed ID: 20572607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Post-cesarean delivery. II. Morbimortality].
Ruíz Velasco V; Rivera Beltrán F; Toscano Bejarano O
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1973 Sep; 34(203):217-28. PubMed ID: 4756177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [High-risk pregnancies in the archives of cesarean section during a 14-year period].
Szczepanski J; Krywko A; Arustowicz Z; Mierzejewski W; Wszelaki-Lass E
Wiad Lek; 1975 Jun; 28(11):929-32. PubMed ID: 1136456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Facility-based maternal death review in three districts in the central region of Malawi: an analysis of causes and characteristics of maternal deaths.
Kongnyuy EJ; Mlava G; van den Broek N
Womens Health Issues; 2009; 19(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 19111783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Maternal mortality in Cesarean section].
Beck A; Vutuc C; Friedl HP
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1992; 32 Suppl 1():64-5. PubMed ID: 1286346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an "intention-to-treat" model.
MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH
Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18307481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Talking to the floor.
Pract Midwife; 2009 Nov; 12(10):50, 52. PubMed ID: 19947053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
