BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16582406)

  • 21. Validation of a vasoepididymostomy predictor model: is vasoepididymostomy truly predictable preoperatively?
    Kavoussi PK; Bird ET
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jul; 92(1):180-1. PubMed ID: 18835603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intussusception vasoepididymostomy with longitudinal suture placement for idiopathic obstructive azoospermia.
    Kumar R; Mukherjee S; Gupta NP
    J Urol; 2010 Apr; 183(4):1489-92. PubMed ID: 20171699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Need for sperm retrieval and cryopreservation at vasectomy reversal.
    Schrepferman CG; Carson MR; Sparks AE; Sandlow JI
    J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1787-9. PubMed ID: 11586225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Retrospective analysis of factors affecting patency rates and causes of failure in use of single-armed two-suture microsurgical vasoepididymostomy].
    Tang SX; Zhou HL; Ding YL; Yang P; Chen Q; Chen X
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Dec; 98(46):3741-3745. PubMed ID: 30541214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of intussusception pull-through end-to-side and conventional end-to-side microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: prospective randomized controlled study in male wistar rats.
    McCallum S; Li PS; Sheynkin Y; Su LM; Chan P; Goldstein M
    J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2284-8. PubMed ID: 11956494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Outcome and late failures compared in 4 techniques of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy in 153 consecutive men.
    Schiff J; Chan P; Li PS; Finkelberg S; Goldstein M
    J Urol; 2005 Aug; 174(2):651-5; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16006931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Intravasal "toothpaste" in men with obstructive azoospermia is derived from vasal epithelium, not sperm.
    Anger JT; Goldstein M
    J Urol; 2004 Aug; 172(2):634-6. PubMed ID: 15247749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on patency and pregnancy after vasectomy reversal.
    Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Kempkensteffen C; Weiske WH; Miller K; Hinz S
    Int J Androl; 2010 Oct; 33(5):730-5. PubMed ID: 19906186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intravasal azoospermia: a surgical dilemma.
    Sheynkin YR; Chen ME; Goldstein M
    BJU Int; 2000 Jun; 85(9):1089-92. PubMed ID: 10848701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Vasectomy reversal.
    Belker AM
    Urol Clin North Am; 1987 Feb; 14(1):155-66. PubMed ID: 3811050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microsurgical reconstruction following failed vasectomy reversal.
    Matthews GJ; McGee KE; Goldstein M
    J Urol; 1997 Mar; 157(3):844-6. PubMed ID: 9072582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Repeat vasectomy reversal after initial failure: overall results and predictors for success.
    Hernandez J; Sabanegh ES
    J Urol; 1999 Apr; 161(4):1153-6. PubMed ID: 10081859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on outcome of vasectomy reversal.
    Boorjian S; Lipkin M; Goldstein M
    J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):304-6. PubMed ID: 14665900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Factors affecting the results of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy].
    Peng J; Yuan YM; Zhang ZC; Gao B; Song WD; Xin ZC; Guo YL; Jin J
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Aug; 43(4):562-4. PubMed ID: 21844967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Experience with macroscopic vasectomy reversal at the Medical College of Wisconsin.
    Dewire DM; Lawson RK
    Wis Med J; 1994 Mar; 93(3):107-9. PubMed ID: 8009877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact on Pregnancy of Gross and Microscopic Vasal Fluid during Vasectomy Reversal.
    Ostrowski KA; Polackwich AS; Conlin MJ; Hedges JC; Fuchs EF
    J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 25595861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Seminal tract obstruction caused by childhood inguinal herniorrhaphy: results of microsurgical reanastomosis.
    Matsuda T; Muguruma K; Hiura Y; Okuno H; Shichiri Y; Yoshida O
    J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):837-40. PubMed ID: 9474163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Association between the presence of sperm in the vasal fluid during vasectomy reversal and postoperative patency: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Scovell JM; Mata DA; Ramasamy R; Herrel LA; Hsiao W; Lipshultz LI
    Urology; 2015 Apr; 85(4):809-13. PubMed ID: 25697786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prospective analysis of outcomes after microsurgical intussusception vasoepididymostomy.
    Chan PT; Brandell RA; Goldstein M
    BJU Int; 2005 Sep; 96(4):598-601. PubMed ID: 16104917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Two cases of delayed patency following "failed" epididymovasostomy and subsequent percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration.
    van Roijen JH
    Can J Urol; 2010 Feb; 17(1):5022-5; discussion 5025. PubMed ID: 20156383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.