These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16582780)

  • 1. Anatomical localization of the umbilicus: an Indian study.
    Abhyankar SV; Rajguru AG; Patil PA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Apr; 117(4):1153-7. PubMed ID: 16582780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anthropometric Determinations of Umbilical Position in Iraqi Adults.
    Abdulla MA; Fahad SMA
    Indian J Plast Surg; 2020 Dec; 53(3):394-398. PubMed ID: 33402770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anatomical Prediction for Surgical Positioning of the Umbilicus in a Croatian Population.
    Duduković M; Kisić H; Baez ML; Bulić K; Veir Z; Cvjetičanin B; Dujmović A; Stipić I; Šuman O; Mijatović D
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Aug; 75(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 25003413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aesthetically pleasant umbilicoplasty.
    Pallua N; Markowicz MP; Grosse F; Walter S
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Jun; 64(6):722-5. PubMed ID: 20489399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In search of the ideal female umbilicus.
    Craig SB; Faller MS; Puckett CL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Jan; 105(1):389-92. PubMed ID: 10627008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The normal position of the umbilicus in the newborn: an aid to improving the cosmetic result in exomphalos major.
    Williams AM; Brain JL
    J Pediatr Surg; 2001 Jul; 36(7):1045-6. PubMed ID: 11431773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraoperative assessment of the umbilicopubic distance: a reliable anatomic landmark for transposition of the umbilicus.
    Rodriguez-Feliz JR; Makhijani S; Przybyla A; Hill D; Chao J
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Feb; 36(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 21638167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determining anatomical position of the umbilicus in Iranian girls, and providing quantitative indices and formula to determine neo-umbilicus during abdominoplasty.
    Parnia R; Ghorbani L; Sepehrvand N; Hatami S; Bazargan-Hejazi S
    Indian J Plast Surg; 2012 Jan; 45(1):94-6. PubMed ID: 22754161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Positioning the Umbilicus in African Newborns with Large Anterior Abdominal Wall Defects.
    Ogundoyin OO; Olulana DI; Lawal TA
    J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg; 2018; 23(3):127-130. PubMed ID: 30050260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Positional anatomy of vessels that may be damaged at laparoscopy: new access criteria based on CT and ultrasonography to avoid vascular injury.
    Sriprasad S; Yu DF; Muir GH; Poulsen J; Sidhu PS
    J Endourol; 2006 Jul; 20(7):498-503. PubMed ID: 16859464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Morphometric Analysis of the Umbilicus According to Age.
    Correia N; Jayyosi L; Chiriac S; Renard Y; Raimond E; Poli-Merol ML; Chaput B; François C
    Aesthet Surg J; 2018 May; 38(6):627-634. PubMed ID: 29126239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Location of the Deep Epigastric Vessels in the Resting and Insufflated Abdomen.
    Burnett TL; Garza-Cavazos A; Groesch K; Robbs R; Diaz-Sylvester P; Siddique SA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):798-803. PubMed ID: 27103374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The inverted-v chevron umbilicoplasty for breast reconstruction and abdominoplasty.
    Lesavoy MA; Fan K; Guenther DA; Herrera F; Little JW
    Aesthet Surg J; 2012 Jan; 32(1):110-6. PubMed ID: 22146416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-Aided Analysis of the "Beautiful" Umbilicus.
    Lee SJ; Garg S; Lee HP
    Aesthet Surg J; 2014 Jul; 34(5):748-56. PubMed ID: 24871304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ideal Male Umbilicus: An Observational Study of Surface Anatomy and Introduction to the SHAPE Classification.
    Graham KA; Livingston RJ
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Oct; 46(5):2333-2341. PubMed ID: 35169914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variance in abdominal wall anatomy and port placement in women undergoing robotic gynecologic surgery.
    Matthews CA; Schubert CM; Woodward AP; Gill EJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(5):583-6. PubMed ID: 20598650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic appraisal of the anatomic relationship of the umbilicus to the aortic bifurcation.
    Nezhat F; Brill AI; Nezhat CH; Nezhat A; Seidman DS; Nezhat C
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1998 May; 5(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 9564060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anatomical landmarks for safe elevation of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: a cadaveric study.
    Chowdhry S; Hazani R; Collis P; Wilhelmi BJ
    Eplasty; 2010 May; 10():e41. PubMed ID: 20523907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advancement flap umbilicoplasty after abdominal wall closure: postoperative results compared with normal umbilical anatomy.
    Lee SL; DuBois JJ; Greenholz SK; Huffman SG
    J Pediatr Surg; 2001 Aug; 36(8):1168-70. PubMed ID: 11479849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new technique involving a spherical stainless steel device to optimize positioning of the umbilicus.
    Mowlavi A; Huynh PM; Huynh DC; Wilhelmi BJ
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 36(5):1062-5. PubMed ID: 22773024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.