These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16582857)

  • 1. Emotional health predicts pain and function after fusion: a prospective multicenter study.
    Trief PM; Ploutz-Snyder R; Fredrickson BE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):823-30. PubMed ID: 16582857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Presurgical biopsychosocial factors predict multidimensional patient: outcomes of interbody cage lumbar fusion.
    LaCaille RA; DeBerard MS; Masters KS; Colledge AL; Bacon W
    Spine J; 2005; 5(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 15653087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical outcomes in older patients after posterolateral lumbar fusion.
    Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Dimar JR; Campbell MJ; Puno RM; Johnson JR
    Spine J; 2007; 7(5):547-51. PubMed ID: 17905316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Depressive burden in the preoperative and early recovery phase predicts poorer surgery outcome among lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a one-year prospective follow-up study.
    Sinikallio S; Aalto T; Airaksinen O; Herno A; Kröger H; Viinamäki H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2573-8. PubMed ID: 19927107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 21937282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting factors of successful recovery from lumbar spine surgery among workers' compensation patients.
    Hodges SD; Humphreys SC; Eck JC; Covington LA; Harrom H
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2001 Feb; 101(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 11293373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of comorbidities on the change in short-form 36 and oswestry scores following lumbar spine surgery.
    Slover J; Abdu WA; Hanscom B; Weinstein JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(17):1974-80. PubMed ID: 16924216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Circumferential fusion improves outcome in comparison with instrumented posterolateral fusion: long-term results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Videbaek TS; Christensen FB; Soegaard R; Hansen ES; Høy K; Helmig P; Niedermann B; Eiskjoer SP; Bünger CE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(25):2875-80. PubMed ID: 17139217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of health-related quality of life after surgical treatment of focal symptomatic spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.
    Rampersaud YR; Ravi B; Lewis SJ; Stas V; Barron R; Davey R; Mahomed N
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):296-304. PubMed ID: 17669690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of spine surgery outcomes: inconsistency of change amongst outcome measurements.
    Copay AG; Martin MM; Subach BR; Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Schuler TC; Berven S
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 20171937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of obesity on clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion.
    Djurasovic M; Bratcher KR; Glassman SD; Dimar JR; Carreon LY
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(16):1789-92. PubMed ID: 18628712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect on clinical outcomes of patient pain expectancies and preoperative Mental Component Summary scores from the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
    Carr FA; Healy KM; Villavicencio AT; Nelson EL; Mason A; Burneikiene S; Hernández TD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Nov; 15(5):486-90. PubMed ID: 21819184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized, prospective, and controlled clinical trial of pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation for cervical fusion.
    Foley KT; Mroz TE; Arnold PM; Chandler HC; Dixon RA; Girasole GJ; Renkens KL; Riew KD; Sasso RC; Smith RC; Tung H; Wecht DA; Whiting DM
    Spine J; 2008; 8(3):436-42. PubMed ID: 17983841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is type of compensation a predictor of outcome after lumbar fusion?
    Gum JL; Glassman SD; Carreon LY
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Mar; 38(5):443-8. PubMed ID: 23080428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cantilever TLIF with structural allograft and RhBMP2 for correction and maintenance of segmental sagittal lordosis: long-term clinical, radiographic, and functional outcome.
    Anand N; Hamilton JF; Perri B; Miraliakbar H; Goldstein T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(20):E748-53. PubMed ID: 16985443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients.
    Sasso RC; Smucker JD; Hacker RJ; Heller JG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2933-40; discussion 2941-2. PubMed ID: 18091483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical treatment for unstable low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults: a prospective controlled study of posterior instrumented fusion compared with combined anterior-posterior fusion.
    Swan J; Hurwitz E; Malek F; van den Haak E; Cheng I; Alamin T; Carragee E
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):606-14. PubMed ID: 17088191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes and presurgery correlates of lumbar discectomy in Utah Workers' Compensation patients.
    DeBerard MS; LaCaille RA; Spielmans G; Colledge A; Parlin MA
    Spine J; 2009 Mar; 9(3):193-203. PubMed ID: 18440278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.