These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16583231)

  • 1. Auditory response characteristics of the piebald odorous frog and their implications.
    Yu ZL; Qiu Q; Xu ZM; Shen JX
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2006 Aug; 192(8):801-6. PubMed ID: 16583231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory sexual difference in the large odorous frog Odorrana graminea.
    Liu WR; Shen JX; Zhang YJ; Xu ZM; Qi Z; Xue MQ
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2014 Apr; 200(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 24510208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasonic communication in frogs.
    Feng AS; Narins PM; Xu CH; Lin WY; Yu ZL; Qiu Q; Xu ZM; Shen JX
    Nature; 2006 Mar; 440(7082):333-6. PubMed ID: 16541072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Little effect of natural noise on high-frequency hearing in frogs, Odorrana tormota.
    Liu J; Yang H; Hu GL; Li S; Xu ZM; Qi Z; Shen JX
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2015 Oct; 201(10):1029-34. PubMed ID: 26260392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasonic singing by the blue-throated hummingbird: a comparison between production and perception.
    Pytte CL; Ficken MS; Moiseff A
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2004 Aug; 190(8):665-73. PubMed ID: 15164219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Male antiphonal calls and phonotaxis evoked by female courtship calls in the large odorous frog (Odorrana graminea).
    Shen JX; Xu ZM; Narins PM
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2023 Jan; 209(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 35939131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasonic communication in concave-eared torrent frogs (Amolops tormotus).
    Feng AS; Narins PM
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2008 Feb; 194(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 18228079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of mating calls and adaptive strategies of Amolops wuyiensis and Odorrana tormotus (Anura) in noise-controlled environments].
    Zhang F; Chen P; Zhao SY
    Dongwuxue Yanjiu; 2013 Jun; 34(3):196-203. PubMed ID: 23775995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasonic frogs show extraordinary sex differences in auditory frequency sensitivity.
    Shen JX; Xu ZM; Yu ZL; Wang S; Zheng DZ; Fan SC
    Nat Commun; 2011 Jun; 2():342. PubMed ID: 21673663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The development of hearing sensitivity in altricial birds: the absolute thresholds of the generation of evoked potentials].
    Aleksandrov LI; Dmitrieva LP
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1991; 41(2):384-90. PubMed ID: 1651627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diversity in noise-induced temporary hearing loss in otophysine fishes.
    Amoser S; Ladich F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2170-9. PubMed ID: 12703727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Lombard effect in male ultrasonic frogs: Regulating antiphonal signal frequency and amplitude in noise.
    Shen JX; Xu ZM
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():27103. PubMed ID: 27345957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Old world frog and bird vocalizations contain prominent ultrasonic harmonics.
    Narins PM; Feng AS; Lin W; Schnitzler HU; Denzinger A; Suthers RA; Xu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Feb; 115(2):910-3. PubMed ID: 15000202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brainstem evoked potentials to tonepips in notched noise.
    Picton TW; Ouellette J; Hamel G; Smith AD
    J Otolaryngol; 1979 Aug; 8(4):289-314. PubMed ID: 513178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Electrophysiological Auditory Measures in Fishes.
    Maruska KP; Sisneros JA
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 877():227-54. PubMed ID: 26515317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic communication in two freshwater gobies: the relationship between ambient noise, hearing thresholds and sound spectrum.
    Lugli M; Yan HY; Fine ML
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2003 Apr; 189(4):309-20. PubMed ID: 12665991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pure ultrasonic communication in an endemic Bornean frog.
    Arch VS; Grafe TU; Gridi-Papp M; Narins PM
    PLoS One; 2009; 4(4):e5413. PubMed ID: 19401782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between auditory sensitivity and vocalization in anabantoid fishes.
    Ladich F; Yan HY
    J Comp Physiol A; 1998 Jun; 182(6):737-46. PubMed ID: 9631554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of hearing and auditory nerve function by combining ABR, DPOAE and eABR tests into a single recording session.
    Polak M; Eshraghi AA; Nehme O; Ahsan S; Guzman J; Delgado RE; He J; Telischi FF; Balkany TJ; Van De Water TR
    J Neurosci Methods; 2004 Apr; 134(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 15003380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The tradeoff between signal detection and recognition rules auditory sensitivity under variable background noise conditions.
    Lugli M
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Dec; 386():1-6. PubMed ID: 26375371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.