These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16583793)

  • 1. English language learners with reading-related LD: linking data from multiple sources to make eligibility determinations.
    Wilkinson CY; Ortiz AA; Robertson PM; Kushner MI
    J Learn Disabil; 2006; 39(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 16583793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. English language learners who struggle with reading: language acquisition or LD?
    Klingner JK; Artiles AJ; Barletta LM
    J Learn Disabil; 2006; 39(2):108-28. PubMed ID: 16583792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examining the role of time and language type in reading development for English Language Learners.
    Betts J; Bolt S; Decker D; Muyskens P; Marston D
    J Sch Psychol; 2009 Jun; 47(3):143-66. PubMed ID: 19328284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Roles of definitional and assessment models in the identification of new or second language learners of English for special education.
    Barrera M
    J Learn Disabil; 2006; 39(2):142-56. PubMed ID: 16583794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Culturally responsive instruction for english language learners with learning disabilities.
    Orosco MJ; O'Connor R
    J Learn Disabil; 2014; 47(6):515-31. PubMed ID: 23407658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning disabilities.
    Lyon GR
    Future Child; 1996; 6(1):54-76. PubMed ID: 8689262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. English language learners, LD, and overrepresentation: A multiple-level analysis.
    Rueda R; Windmueller MP
    J Learn Disabil; 2006; 39(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 16583791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Teacher perceptions of differences among elementary students with and without learning disabilities in referred samples.
    Oakland T; Shermis MD; Coleman M
    J Learn Disabil; 1990 Oct; 23(8):499-504, 520. PubMed ID: 2246602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response to intervention and English-language learners: instructional and assessment considerations.
    Linan-Thompson S; Ortiz AA
    Semin Speech Lang; 2009 May; 30(2):105-20. PubMed ID: 19399696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of states' criteria and procedures for identifying children with learning disabilities.
    Frankenberger W; Fronzaglio K
    J Learn Disabil; 1991 Oct; 24(8):495-500. PubMed ID: 1940607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discrepancy between definitions of learning disabilities and school practices: an empirical investigation.
    MacMillan DL; Gresham FM; Bocian KM
    J Learn Disabil; 1998; 31(4):314-26. PubMed ID: 9666608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Story grammar and comprehension and production of narrative prose by students with learning disabilities.
    Montague M; Maddux CD; Dereshiwsky MI
    J Learn Disabil; 1990 Mar; 23(3):190-7. PubMed ID: 2313193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The cross-linguistic transfer of early literacy skills: the role of initial L1 and L2 skills and language of instruction.
    Cárdenas-Hagan E; Carlson CD; Pollard-Durodola SD
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2007 Jul; 38(3):249-59. PubMed ID: 17625051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation practices for college students with LD.
    Ofiesh NS; McAfee JK
    J Learn Disabil; 2000; 33(1):14-25. PubMed ID: 15505952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. English language learners struggling to learn to read: emergent scholarship on linguistic differences and learning disabilities.
    Klingner J; Artiles AJ
    J Learn Disabil; 2006; 39(5):386-9. PubMed ID: 17004671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differentiating literacy growth of ELL students with LD from other high-risk subgroups and general education peers: evidence from grades 3-10.
    Solari EJ; Petscher Y; Folsom JS
    J Learn Disabil; 2014; 47(4):329-48. PubMed ID: 23124380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response to instruction, English language learners and disproportionate representation: the role of assessment.
    Linan-Thompson S
    Psicothema; 2010 Nov; 22(4):970-4. PubMed ID: 21044540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A report of cognitive, academic, and linguistic profiles for college students with and without learning disabilities.
    Morris M; Leuenberger J
    J Learn Disabil; 1990; 23(6):355-60, 385. PubMed ID: 2366041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The diagnosis of LD in English learners: is it nondiscriminatory?
    Figueroa RA; Newsome P
    J Learn Disabil; 2006; 39(3):206-14. PubMed ID: 16724793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of antecedent color on reading for students with learning disabilities and co-occurring attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder.
    Belfiore PJ; Grskovic JA; Murphy AM; Zentall SS
    J Learn Disabil; 1996 Jul; 29(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 8763558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.