These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16583900)

  • 1. Auditory evoked potentials in females with high and low acceptance of background noise when listening to speech.
    Tampas JW; Harkrider AW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1548-61. PubMed ID: 16583900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in responses from the cochleae and central nervous systems of females with low versus high acceptable noise levels.
    Harkrider AW; Tampas JW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Oct; 17(9):667-76. PubMed ID: 17039769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship Between Auditory and Visual Noise Acceptance in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    Faulkner KF; Plyler PN; Easterday MK; Slade TM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Feb; 31(2):118-128. PubMed ID: 31287056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.
    Bidelman GM; Momtaz S
    Neurosci Lett; 2021 Feb; 746():135664. PubMed ID: 33497718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of listener's gender on the acceptance of background noise.
    Rogers DS; Harkrider AW; Burchfield SB; Nabelek AK
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2003 Sep; 14(7):372-82; quiz 401. PubMed ID: 14620611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech-evoked auditory brainstem response with ipsilateral noise in adults with unilateral hearing loss.
    Abd El-Ghaffar NM; El-Gharib AM; Kolkaila EA; Elmahallawy TH
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 138(2):145-152. PubMed ID: 29022419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Freyaldenhoven MC; Plyler PN; Thelin JW; Hedrick MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 17675593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Test-Retest Reliability of Dual-Recorded Brainstem versus Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials to Speech.
    Bidelman GM; Pousson M; Dugas C; Fehrenbach A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):164-174. PubMed ID: 29401063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acceptable noise level, phoneme recognition in noise, and measures of auditory efferent activity.
    Harkrider AW; Smith SB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Sep; 16(8):530-45. PubMed ID: 16295240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Brainstem Evoked Potential Indices of Subcortical Auditory Processing After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
    Vander Werff KR; Rieger B
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):e200-e214. PubMed ID: 28319479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech Recognition at the Acceptable Noise Level.
    Gordon-Hickey S; Morlas H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):443-450. PubMed ID: 26055834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acceptance of background noise, working memory capacity, and auditory evoked potentials in subjects with normal hearing.
    Brännström KJ; Zunic E; Borovac A; Ibertsson T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):542-52. PubMed ID: 22992261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensory-cognitive interaction in the neural encoding of speech in noise: a review.
    Anderson S; Kraus N
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Oct; 21(9):575-85. PubMed ID: 21241645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating peripheral sources of speech-in-noise variability in listeners with normal audiograms.
    Smith SB; Krizman J; Liu C; White-Schwoch T; Nicol T; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():66-74. PubMed ID: 30504092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acceptable Noise Levels and Preferred Signal-to-noise Ratios for Speech and Music.
    Lee D; Lewis JD; Johnstone PM; Plyler PN
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):1013-1022. PubMed ID: 34759206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship of locus of control, self-control, and acceptable noise levels for young listeners with normal hearing.
    Nichols AC; Gordon-Hickey S
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):353-9. PubMed ID: 22229761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Brainstem auditory responses to resolved and unresolved harmonics of a synthetic vowel in quiet and noise.
    Laroche M; Dajani HR; Prévost F; Marcoux AM
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 22814487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech-evoked auditory brainstem response; electrophysiological evidence of upper brainstem facilitative role on sound lateralization in noise.
    Moossavi A; Lotfi Y; Javanbakht M; Faghihzadeh S
    Neurol Sci; 2020 Mar; 41(3):611-617. PubMed ID: 31732889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Brainstem auditory physiology in children with listening difficulties
    Hunter LL; Blankenship CM; Shinn-Cunningham B; Hood L; Zadeh LM; Moore DR
    Hear Res; 2023 Mar; 429():108705. PubMed ID: 36709582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural correlates of perceptual learning in the auditory brainstem: efferent activity predicts and reflects improvement at a speech-in-noise discrimination task.
    de Boer J; Thornton AR
    J Neurosci; 2008 May; 28(19):4929-37. PubMed ID: 18463246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.