144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16583905)
21. The effects of reverberant self- and overlap-masking on speech recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
Desmond JM; Collins LM; Throckmorton CS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):EL304-10. PubMed ID: 24907838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience.
Whitmal NA; Poissant SF; Freyman RL; Helfer KS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2376-88. PubMed ID: 17902872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Simulations of cochlear implant hearing using filtered harmonic complexes: implications for concurrent sound segregation.
Deeks JM; Carlyon RP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Apr; 115(4):1736-46. PubMed ID: 15101652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Masking release and modulation interference in cochlear implant and simulation listeners.
Jin SH; Nie Y; Nelson P
Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):135-46. PubMed ID: 23800809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Environment-specific noise suppression for improved speech intelligibility by cochlear implant users.
Hu Y; Loizou PC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jun; 127(6):3689-95. PubMed ID: 20550267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A channel-selection criterion for suppressing reverberation in cochlear implants.
Kokkinakis K; Hazrati O; Loizou PC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3221-32. PubMed ID: 21568424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effects of reverberation on a listener's ability to recognize target sentences in the presence of up to three synchronized masking sentences.
Abouchacra KS; Besing J; Koehnke J; Letowski T
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):468-76. PubMed ID: 21668326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A dissociation between speech understanding and perceived reverberation.
Ellis GM; Zahorik P
Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 379():52-58. PubMed ID: 31075611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Informational masking of speech produced by speech-like sounds without linguistic content.
Chen J; Li H; Li L; Wu X; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2914-26. PubMed ID: 22501069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reverberation limits the release from informational masking obtained in the harmonic and binaural domains.
Deroche ML; Culling JF; Lavandier M; Gracco VL
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):363-379. PubMed ID: 27645216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The use of cochlear's SCAN and wireless microphones to improve speech understanding in noise with the Nucleus6® CP900 processor.
De Ceulaer G; Pascoal D; Vanpoucke F; Govaerts PJ
Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):837-843. PubMed ID: 28695749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Spatial release from masking in reverberation for school-age children.
Peng ZE; Pausch F; Fels J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Nov; 150(5):3263. PubMed ID: 34852617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reverberation suppression in cochlear implants using a blind channel-selection strategy.
Hazrati O; Loizou PC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4188-96. PubMed ID: 23742370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
Collin B; Lavandier M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Listening to speech in a background of other talkers: effects of talker number and noise vocoding.
Rosen S; Souza P; Ekelund C; Majeed AA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2431-43. PubMed ID: 23556608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Parameter tuning of time-frequency masking algorithms for reverberant artifact removal within the cochlear implant stimulus.
Shahidi LK; Collins LM; Mainsah BO
Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Nov; 23(6):309-316. PubMed ID: 35875863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Speech recognition with varying numbers and types of competing talkers by normal-hearing, cochlear-implant, and implant simulation subjects.
Cullington HE; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):450-61. PubMed ID: 18177173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Speech perception and talker segregation: effects of level, pitch, and tactile support with multiple simultaneous talkers.
Drullman R; Bronkhorst AW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3090-8. PubMed ID: 15603154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
