These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16583909)

  • 1. Loud speech over noise: some spectral attributes, with gender differences.
    Ternström S; Bohman M; Södersten M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1648-65. PubMed ID: 16583909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Loud speech in realistic environmental noise: phonetogram data, perceptual voice quality, subjective ratings, and gender differences in healthy speakers.
    Södersten M; Ternström S; Bohman M
    J Voice; 2005 Mar; 19(1):29-46. PubMed ID: 15766848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spectrum factors relevant to phonetogram measurement.
    Gramming P; Sundberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jun; 83(6):2352-60. PubMed ID: 3411026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fundamental frequency influences the relationship between sound pressure level and spectral balance in female classically trained singers.
    Collyer S; Davis PJ; Thorpe CW; Callaghan J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):396-406. PubMed ID: 19603896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of post-loading rest on acoustic parameters with special reference to gender and ergonomic factors.
    Vintturi J; Alku P; Lauri ER; Sala E; Sihvo M; Vilkman E
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2001; 53(6):338-50. PubMed ID: 11721140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship Between Subglottal Pressure and Sound Pressure Level in Untrained Voices.
    Björklund S; Sundberg J
    J Voice; 2016 Jan; 30(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 25913752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cancellation of simulated environmental noise as a tool for measuring vocal performance during noise exposure.
    Ternström S; Södersten M; Bohman M
    J Voice; 2002 Jun; 16(2):195-206. PubMed ID: 12150372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Natural Voice Use in Patients With Voice Disorders and Vocally Healthy Speakers Based on 2 Days Voice Accumulator Information From a Database.
    Södersten M; Salomão GL; McAllister A; Ternström S
    J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):646.e1-9. PubMed ID: 26073776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feature Maps of the Acoustic Spectrum of the Voice.
    Pabon P; Ternström S
    J Voice; 2020 Jan; 34(1):161.e1-161.e26. PubMed ID: 30269894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliable jitter and shimmer measurements in voice clinics: the relevance of vowel, gender, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency effects in a typical clinical task.
    Brockmann M; Drinnan MJ; Storck C; Carding PN
    J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 20381308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in voice and subjective sensations during a 45-min vocal loading test in female subjects with vocal training.
    Laukkanen AM; Järvinen K; Artkoski M; Waaramaa-Mäki-Kulmala T; Kankare E; Sippola S; Syrjä T; Salo A
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2004; 56(6):335-46. PubMed ID: 15557772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of vocal loudness variation on spectrum balance as reflected by the alpha measure of long-term-average spectra of speech.
    Sundberg J; Nordenberg M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):453-7. PubMed ID: 16875241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic measures and self-reports of vocal fatigue by female teachers.
    Laukkanen AM; Ilomäki I; Leppänen K; Vilkman E
    J Voice; 2008 May; 22(3):283-9. PubMed ID: 17134877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustical properties of speech produced in noise presented through supra-aural earphones.
    Letowski T; Frank T; Caravella J
    Ear Hear; 1993 Oct; 14(5):332-8. PubMed ID: 8224576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic analyses of thyroidectomy-related changes in vowel phonation.
    Solomon NP; Awan SN; Helou LB; Stojadinovic A
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):711-20. PubMed ID: 23177742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysing the vocal behaviour of teachers during classroom teaching using a portable voice accumulator.
    Nusseck M; Richter B; Spahn C; Echternach M
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Apr; 43(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 28635402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acoustic Characteristics of Vocal Sounds Used by Professional Actors Performing Classical Material Without Microphones in Outdoor Theatre.
    Melton J; Bradford Z; Lee J
    J Voice; 2022 Sep; 36(5):733.e23-733.e29. PubMed ID: 33008725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audio-vocal responses of vocal fundamental frequency and formant during sustained vowel vocalizations in different noises.
    Lee SH; Hsiao TY; Lee GS
    Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():1-6. PubMed ID: 25749240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic comparison of vowel sounds among adult females.
    Franca MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):671.e9-17. PubMed ID: 22285451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.