BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1778 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16584412)

  • 1. Tissue alterations at implant-supported single-tooth replacements: a 1-year prospective clinical study.
    Cardaropoli G; Lekholm U; Wennström JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Apr; 17(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 16584412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective clinical evaluation of 307 single-tooth morse taper-connection implants: a multicenter study.
    Mangano C; Mangano F; Piattelli A; Iezzi G; Mangano A; La Colla L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):394-400. PubMed ID: 20369101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Immediately restored, single-tapered implants in the anterior maxilla: prosthodontic and aesthetic outcomes after 1 year.
    Hall JA; Payne AG; Purton DG; Torr B; Duncan WJ; De Silva RK
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Mar; 9(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 17362495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cemented CeraOne and porcelain fused to TiAdapt abutment single-implant crown restorations: a 10-year comparative follow-up study.
    Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 18783414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A short-term clinical evaluation of immediately restored maxillary TiOblast single-tooth implants.
    Norton MR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):274-81. PubMed ID: 15101600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A multicenter 12-month evaluation of single-tooth implants restored 3 weeks after 1-stage surgery.
    Cooper L; Felton DA; Kugelberg CF; Ellner S; Chaffee N; Molina AL; Moriarty JD; Paquette D; Palmqvist U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(2):182-92. PubMed ID: 11324206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Submerged or non-submerged healing of endosseous implants to be used in the rehabilitation of partially dentate patients.
    Cecchinato D; Olsson C; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 31(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 15016259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Immediate implant placement and restoration in the esthetic zone: a prospective study with 18 months of follow-up.
    Tortamano P; Camargo LO; Bello-Silva MS; Kanashiro LH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):345-50. PubMed ID: 20369094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Immediate single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: 3-year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics.
    Cosyn J; Eghbali A; De Bruyn H; Collys K; Cleymaet R; De Rouck T
    J Clin Periodontol; 2011 Aug; 38(8):746-53. PubMed ID: 21752044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aesthetic outcome of single-tooth implant restorations following early implant placement and guided bone regeneration: crown and soft tissue dimensions compared with contralateral teeth.
    Cosyn J; De Rouck T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1063-9. PubMed ID: 19519788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: 1-year prospective study.
    Kan JY; Rungcharassaeng K; Lozada J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 12608666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Immediate versus one-stage restoration of small-diameter implants for a single missing maxillary lateral incisor: a 3-year randomized clinical trial.
    Degidi M; Nardi D; Piattelli A
    J Periodontol; 2009 Sep; 80(9):1393-8. PubMed ID: 19722788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interproximal papilla levels following early versus delayed placement of single-tooth implants: a controlled clinical trial.
    Schropp L; Isidor F; Kostopoulos L; Wenzel A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):753-61. PubMed ID: 16274150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-year prospective clinical comparison of immediate replacement vs. immediate restoration of single tooth in the esthetic zone.
    Palattella P; Torsello F; Cordaro L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1148-53. PubMed ID: 18983318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 4-year prospective clinical study.
    Vigolo P; Givani A; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 15101598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An alternative method for flapless implant placement and an immediate provisional crown: a case report.
    Turkyilmaz I; Suarez JC
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):89-95. PubMed ID: 19430631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of soft-tissue alteration around implant-supported single-tooth restoration in the anterior maxilla: the pink esthetic score.
    Lai HC; Zhang ZY; Wang F; Zhuang LF; Liu X; Pu YP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jun; 19(6):560-4. PubMed ID: 18474062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A 4-year prospective clinical and radiological study of maxillary dental implants supporting single-tooth crowns using early and delayed loading protocols.
    Turkyilmaz I; Avci M; Kuran S; Ozbek EN
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 18031444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incidence of inter-proximal papilla between a tooth and an adjacent immediate implant placed into a fresh extraction socket: 1-year prospective study.
    Lops D; Chiapasco M; Rossi A; Bressan E; Romeo E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1135-40. PubMed ID: 18983316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immediate provisionalization of single-tooth implants in fresh-extraction sites at the maxillary esthetic zone: up to 6 years of follow-up.
    Mijiritsky E; Mardinger O; Mazor Z; Chaushu G
    Implant Dent; 2009 Aug; 18(4):326-33. PubMed ID: 19667821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 89.