261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16584413)
1. The effects of implant surface roughness and surgical technique on implant fixation in an in vitro model.
Shalabi MM; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Apr; 17(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 16584413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 20070754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 19298286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histological evaluation of oral implants inserted with different surgical techniques into the trabecular bone of goats.
Shalabi MM; Wolke JG; de Ruijter AJ; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Aug; 18(4):489-95. PubMed ID: 17517059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adapted preparation technique for screw-type implants: explorative in vitro pilot study in a porcine bone model.
Beer A; Gahleitner A; Holm A; Birkfellner W; Homolka P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 17224030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of primary and secondary stability of titanium implants using different surgical techniques.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Walboomers XF; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):487-92. PubMed ID: 23638908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone particles and the undersized surgical technique.
Tabassum A; Walboomers XF; Wolke JG; Meijer GJ; Jansen JA
J Dent Res; 2010 Jun; 89(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 20212102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A mechanical evaluation of implants placed with different surgical techniques into the trabecular bone of goats.
Shalabi MM; Wolke JG; de Ruijter AJ; Jansen JA
J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 17520947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant stability and bone density: assessment of correlation in fresh cadavers using conventional and osteotome implant sockets.
Cehreli MC; Kökat AM; Comert A; Akkocaoğlu M; Tekdemir I; Akça K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1163-9. PubMed ID: 19681964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences in implant stability associated with various methods of preparation of the implant bed: an in vitro study.
Ahn SJ; Leesungbok R; Lee SW; Heo YK; Kang KL
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):366-72. PubMed ID: 22633592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis of dental implant systems in an animal model with loaded implants.
Al-Nawas B; Wagner W; Grötz KA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):726-32. PubMed ID: 17066633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical outcome of 802 immediately loaded 2-stage submerged implants with a new grit-blasted and acid-etched surface: 12-month follow-up.
Degidi M; Piattelli A; Gehrke P; Carinci F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):763-8. PubMed ID: 17066638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of superficial roughness and design on the primary stability of dental implants.
Dos Santos MV; Elias CN; Cavalcanti Lima JH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Sep; 13(3):215-23. PubMed ID: 19744197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of defect depth on resonance frequency analysis and insertion torque values for implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a human cadaver study.
Turkyilmaz I; Sennerby L; Yilmaz B; Bilecenoglu B; Ozbek EN
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Mar; 11(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18384400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of drilling dimension on implant placement torque and early osseointegration stages: an experimental study in dogs.
Campos FE; Gomes JB; Marin C; Teixeira HS; Suzuki M; Witek L; Zanetta-Barbosa D; Coelho PG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 70(1):e43-50. PubMed ID: 22182660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Removal torque and histomorphometric evaluation of bioceramic grit-blasted/acid-etched and dual acid-etched implant surfaces: an experimental study in dogs.
Marin C; Granato R; Suzuki M; Gil JN; Piattelli A; Coelho PG
J Periodontol; 2008 Oct; 79(10):1942-9. PubMed ID: 18834250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of surface modifications on early bone healing around plateau root form implants: an experimental study in rabbits.
Suzuki M; Calasans-Maia MD; Marin C; Granato R; Gil JN; Granjeiro JM; Coelho PG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1631-8. PubMed ID: 20430505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone responses to titanium implants surface-roughened by sandblasted and double etched treatments in a rabbit model.
Yang GL; He FM; Yang XF; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):516-24. PubMed ID: 18602288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
