261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16584413)
21. Biomechanical and histologic evaluation of non-washed resorbable blasting media and alumina-blasted/acid-etched surfaces.
Coelho PG; Marin C; Granato R; Giro G; Suzuki M; Bonfante EA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):132-5. PubMed ID: 21435012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Interface reaction at dental implants inserted in condensed bone.
Büchter A; Kleinheinz J; Wiesmann HP; Jayaranan M; Joos U; Meyer U
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Oct; 16(5):509-17. PubMed ID: 16164455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of implant shape, surface morphology, surgical technique and bone quality on the primary stability of dental implants.
Elias CN; Rocha FA; Nascimento AL; Coelho PG
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Dec; 16():169-80. PubMed ID: 23182386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of anodized oxidation or turned implants on bone healing after using conventional drilling or trabecular compaction technique: histomorphometric analysis and RFA.
Kim SK; Lee HN; Choi YC; Heo SJ; Lee CW; Choie MK
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Dec; 17(6):644-50. PubMed ID: 17092222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of surgical techniques on primary implant stability and peri-implant bone.
Fanuscu MI; Chang TL; Akça K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Dec; 65(12):2487-91. PubMed ID: 18022474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biological and biomechanical evaluation of bone remodelling and implant stability after using an osteotome technique.
Büchter A; Kleinheinz J; Wiesmann HP; Kersken J; Nienkemper M; Weyhrother Hv; Joos U; Meyer U
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Feb; 16(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15642025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifications on the early stages of osseointegration.
Meirelles L; Currie F; Jacobsson M; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):641-7. PubMed ID: 18807559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; An CH; Hanawa T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The influence of surface roughness on the displacement of osteogenic bone particles during placement of titanium screw-type implants.
Tabassum A; Walboomers F; Wolke JG; Meijer GJ; Jansen JA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 19673924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Removal torques of conical, tapered implant abutments: the effects of anodization and reduction of surface area.
Squier RS; Psoter WJ; Taylor TD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 11858571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces.
Gottlow J; Barkarmo S; Sennerby L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e204-12. PubMed ID: 22487460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Is insertion torque correlated to bone-implant contact percentage in the early healing period? A histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of 17 human-retrieved dental implants.
Degidi M; Perrotti V; Strocchi R; Piattelli A; Iezzi G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Aug; 20(8):778-81. PubMed ID: 19486080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs.
Strnad J; Urban K; Povysil C; Strnad Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 18700375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Required minimum primary stability and torque values for immediate loading of mini dental implants: an experimental study in nonviable bovine femoral bone.
Dilek O; Tezulas E; Dincel M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):e20-7. PubMed ID: 18230373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model.
Al-Nawas B; Groetz KA; Goetz H; Duschner H; Wagner W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17944964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biomechanical evaluation of endosseous implants at early implantation times: a study in dogs.
Coelho PG; Granato R; Marin C; Bonfante EA; Freire JN; Janal MN; Gil JN; Suzuki M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1667-75. PubMed ID: 20561471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical evaluation of undersized drilling on implant biomechanical stability at early implantation times.
Coelho PG; Marin C; Teixeira HS; Campos FE; Gomes JB; Guastaldi F; Anchieta RB; Silveira L; Bonfante EA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):e69-75. PubMed ID: 23351770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of surgical technique, implant shape and diameter on the primary stability in cancellous bone.
Bilhan H; Geckili O; Mumcu E; Bozdag E; Sünbüloğlu E; Kutay O
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Dec; 37(12):900-7. PubMed ID: 20529176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of alendronate on endosseous implant integration: an in vivo study in rabbits.
Chacon GE; Stine EA; Larsen PE; Beck FM; McGlumphy EA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 64(7):1005-9. PubMed ID: 16781331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of repeated torque/mechanical loading cycles on two different abutment types in implants with internal tapered connections: an in vitro study.
Ricciardi Coppedê A; de Mattos Mda G; Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):624-32. PubMed ID: 19281502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
