These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16585231)

  • 1. Pejorative testimony about opposing experts and colleagues: "fouling one's own nest".
    Gutheil TG; Schetky DH; Simon RI
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 16585231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "Telling tales out of court": a pilot study of experts' disclosures about opposing experts.
    Gutheil TG; Commons ML; Miller PM; LaLlave J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 11196255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Commentary: The medical practitioner as an expert.
    Akinkunmi AA
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 16585232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An annotated bibliography for the testifying child and adolescent psychiatrist.
    Ash P; O'Leary PJ
    Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 2011 Jul; 20(3):577-90. PubMed ID: 21683922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ethical confrontation of the unethical forensic colleague.
    Brodsky SL; McKinzey RK
    Prof Psychol; 2002 Jun; 33(3):307-9. PubMed ID: 15233125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Withholding, seducing, and threatening: a pilot study of further attorney pressures on expert witnesses.
    Gutheil TG; Commons M; Miller PM
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 11592463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adventures in the twilight zone: empirical studies of the attorney-expert relationship.
    Gutheil TG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 11302380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A pilot Rasch scaling of lawyers' perceptions of expert bias.
    Dattilio FM; Commons ML; Adams KM; Gutheil TG; Sadoff RL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):482-91. PubMed ID: 17185478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Ethical aspects of forensic psychiatry and psychology].
    Gierowski JK; Jedrzejowska R; Leśniak R; Ryn ZJ
    Folia Med Cracov; 1998; 39(3-4):121-30. PubMed ID: 10816963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Addressing the perfect phantom on the witness stand.
    Brodsky SL; Heller P
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):541-3. PubMed ID: 19092073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The CHESS method of forensic opinion formulation: striving to checkmate bias.
    Wills CD
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 19092072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The differences between forensic psychiatry and forensic psychology.
    Grisso T
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(2):133-45. PubMed ID: 8364232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The dentist as expert witness.
    Meckler M
    Dent Clin North Am; 1982 Apr; 26(2):383-8. PubMed ID: 6950915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attorneys' requests for complete tax records from opposing expert witnesses: some approaches to the problem.
    Gutheil TG; Simon RI; Simpson S
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):518-22. PubMed ID: 17185482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Courtroom whores"?--or why do attorneys call us?: findings from a survey on attorneys' use of mental health experts.
    Mossman D; Kapp MB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 9554707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A nationwide questionnaire survey of medical experts in mental health evaluation].
    Koike J; Morita N; Nakatani Y
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2009; 111(1):10-23. PubMed ID: 19301591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toward a critical forensic psychiatry.
    Deaton RJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 12875502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effectiveness of opposing expert witnesses for educating jurors about unreliable expert evidence.
    Levett LM; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Aug; 32(4):363-74. PubMed ID: 17940854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The presentation of forensic psychiatric evidence in court.
    Gutheil TG
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2000; 37(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 10994298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [General problems of expert testimony of psychiatrists and clinical psychologists in legal procedures and the suggestions for their cooperation].
    Rutkowski R; Gordon T
    Psychiatr Pol; 1989; 23(5-6):403-11. PubMed ID: 2485475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.