These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16586485)

  • 1. Comparative analysis of dental enamel polyvinylsiloxane impression and polyurethane casting methods for SEM research.
    Galbany J; Estebaranz F; Martínez LM; Romero A; De Juan J; Turbón D; Pérez-Pérez A
    Microsc Res Tech; 2006 Apr; 69(4):246-52. PubMed ID: 16586485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A qualitative assessment of non-carious cervical lesions in extracted human teeth.
    Nguyen C; Ranjitkar S; Kaidonis JA; Townsend GC
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 18304241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a reproduction technique for the study of the enamel composite/bracket base area.
    Wilner FJ; Oliver RG
    J Orthod; 2000 Sep; 27(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 11099559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An universal and accurate replica technique for scanning electron microscope study in clinical dentistry.
    Lambrechts P; Vanherle G; Davidson C
    Microsc Acta; 1981 Sep; 85(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 7300696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Replication technique for studying microstructure in fossil enamel.
    Beynon AD
    Scanning Microsc; 1987 Jun; 1(2):663-9. PubMed ID: 3112938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo wear of enamel by a lithia disilicate-based core ceramic used for posterior fixed partial dentures: first-year results.
    Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Young H; Jones J; Yang M; Anusavice KJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):391-6. PubMed ID: 16900824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
    Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the fit of Procera crowns made from stone with those made from polyurethane resin.
    Rahme HY; Adib SM; Zebouni EA; Bechara BB; Rifai KT
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 19552368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional assessment of dental casts' occlusal surfaces using two impression materials.
    Tarawneh FM; Panos PG; Athanasiou AE
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 35(11):821-6. PubMed ID: 18482343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro and in vivo replication for scanning electron microscopy of the cervical region of human teeth.
    Bevenius J; Hultenby K
    Scanning Microsc; 1991 Sep; 5(3):731-9; discussion 739-40. PubMed ID: 1808711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Altered polyurethane cast for a partial removable dental prosthesis.
    Lee JH; Cho SA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):305-6. PubMed ID: 25935083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of surfactant on surface hardness of dental stone and investment casts produced from polyvinyl siloxane duplicating materials.
    Al-Johani A; Clark RK; Juszczyk AS; Radford DR
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Jun; 16(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 18637383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictable definitive impressions for multiple indirect restorations using a modified putty and wash impression procedure.
    Leong EW; Cheng AC; Khin NT; Lee H; Leong DJ
    Singapore Dent J; 2007 Dec; 29(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18472530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Copper plate replica SEM of developing dental plaque in monkeys (Macaca fascicularis).
    Radford JR; Beesley JE; Beighton D; Radford DR
    J Dent; 1993 Apr; 21(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 8473598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term dimensional stability and reproduction of surface detail of four polyvinyl siloxane duplicating materials.
    Pant R; Juszczyk AS; Clark RK; Radford DR
    J Dent; 2008 Jun; 36(6):456-61. PubMed ID: 18433976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Marginal adaptation after cementing of gold inlays cast by an experimental procedure. SEM analysis].
    Traini T; Di Iorio D; Murmura G; Caputi S
    Minerva Stomatol; 2004 Mar; 53(3):69-76. PubMed ID: 15107777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.