These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16586485)

  • 21. In vitro techniques for erosive lesion formation and examination in dental enamel.
    Millward A; Shaw L; Smith AJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1995 Jan; 22(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 7897557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of measurement site on the dimensional accuracy of die-forming materials and techniques.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; Theodotou N; Glaros AG; Williams K
    Gen Dent; 2004; 52(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 15206253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Scanning electron microscopy in clinical dental research. Methodology for clinical & laboratory studies.
    Fischlschweiger W; Antonson DE
    Fla Dent J; 1983; 54(1):17-9, 37-8. PubMed ID: 6583074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A review of dental microwear and diet in modern mammals.
    Teaford MF
    Scanning Microsc; 1988 Jun; 2(2):1149-66. PubMed ID: 3041572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Recording surface detail on moist surfaces with elastomeric impression materials.
    McCabe JF; Carrick TE
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Mar; 14(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 16599098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preservation of the negative image of tooth enamel with dental impression material enhances morphometric measurements of gingival overgrowth.
    Miller ML; Andringa A; Turner LT; Dalton TP; Derkenne S; Nebert DW
    Microsc Res Tech; 2003 Apr; 60(5):528-36. PubMed ID: 12619128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A method to make a preliminary impression of mobile teeth.
    Lee H; Park C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):52-3. PubMed ID: 19573690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Replication techniques with new dental impression materials in combination with different negative impression materials.
    Pameijer CH
    Scan Electron Microsc; 1979; (2):571-4. PubMed ID: 392716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of detail reproduction for three die materials by using scanning electron microscopy and two-dimensional profilometry.
    Derrien G; Le Menn G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 7674178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The wetting of surface-treated silicone impression materials by gypsum mixes containing disinfectants and modifiers.
    Abdelaziz KM; Combe EC; Hodges JS
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Jun; 14(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16011621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
    Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
    Quante K; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Surface detail reproduction of elastomeric impression materials related to rheological properties.
    German MJ; Carrick TE; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):951-6. PubMed ID: 18164051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accurate impression material and technique for well-adapted restorations.
    Trushkowsky R
    Dent Today; 2007 Feb; 26(2):120, 122-3. PubMed ID: 17348280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Sadan A
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 17(5):310. PubMed ID: 16121746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of preference of mixing techniques and duration of mixing and tray loading for two viscosities of vinyl polysiloxane material.
    Nam J; Raigrodski AJ; Townsend J; Lepe X; Mancl LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jan; 97(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 17280886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Determination of the accuracy of three die systems.
    Bloem TJ; Czerniawski B; Luke J; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):758-62. PubMed ID: 2072316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mastering the impression technique for simple to complex treatments.
    Paquette JM; Sheets CG
    Dent Today; 2000 Jun; 19(6):68-75. PubMed ID: 12524795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.