These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16587595)

  • 1. THE ABSORPTION COEFFICIENT OF HARD gamma-RAYS.
    Chao CY
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1930 Jun; 16(6):431-3. PubMed ID: 16587595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A method for determination mass absorption coefficient of gamma rays by Compton scattering.
    El Abd A
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2014 Dec; 94():247-253. PubMed ID: 25241360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Saturable absorption of intense hard X-rays in iron.
    Yoneda H; Inubushi Y; Yabashi M; Katayama T; Ishikawa T; Ohashi H; Yumoto H; Yamauchi K; Mimura H; Kitamura H
    Nat Commun; 2014 Oct; 5():5080. PubMed ID: 25270525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mass absorption and mass energy transfer coefficients for 0.4-10 MeV gamma rays in elemental solids and gases.
    Gurler O; Oz H; Yalcin S; Gundogdu O
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009 Jan; 67(1):201-5. PubMed ID: 19019690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Induction and repair of DNA strand breaks and 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine-detectable sites in 40-75 kVp X-irradiated compared to 60Co gamma-irradiated human cell lines.
    Mirzayans R; Waters R; Paterson MC
    Radiat Res; 1988 Apr; 114(1):168-85. PubMed ID: 3353503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of inhomogeneous optical scattering coefficient distribution on recovery of optical absorption coefficient maps using tomographic photoacoustic data.
    Li X; Jiang H
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Feb; 58(4):999-1011. PubMed ID: 23339968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The photonuclear neutron and gamma-ray backgrounds in the fast ignition experiment.
    Arikawa Y; Nagai T; Hosoda H; Abe Y; Kojima S; Fujioka S; Sarukura N; Nakai M; Shiraga H; Ozaki T; Azechi H
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2012 Oct; 83(10):10D909. PubMed ID: 23126912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Letter: Formulae for calculation of 50 per cent depth dose and linear absorption coefficient in water of cobalt-60 gamma rays.
    di Pietrantonj F
    Br J Radiol; 1976 Aug; 49(584):736-8. PubMed ID: 953410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Femtosecond response of polyatomic molecules to ultra-intense hard X-rays.
    Rudenko A; Inhester L; Hanasaki K; Li X; Robatjazi SJ; Erk B; Boll R; Toyota K; Hao Y; Vendrell O; Bomme C; Savelyev E; Rudek B; Foucar L; Southworth SH; Lehmann CS; Kraessig B; Marchenko T; Simon M; Ueda K; Ferguson KR; Bucher M; Gorkhover T; Carron S; Alonso-Mori R; Koglin JE; Correa J; Williams GJ; Boutet S; Young L; Bostedt C; Son SK; Santra R; Rolles D
    Nature; 2017 Jun; 546(7656):129-132. PubMed ID: 28569799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Distribution of ionizing radiation absorption in microstructures of a biosystem].
    Medvedev SIu; Telichko FF; Gedeon VF
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 1997; 37(5):727-34. PubMed ID: 9417300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standardization and determination of the total internal conversion coefficient of In-111.
    Matos IT; Koskinas MF; Nascimento TS; Yamazaki IM; Dias MS
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2014 May; 87():192-4. PubMed ID: 24440539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The equivalent incidence angle for porous absorbers backed by a hard surface.
    Jeong CH; Brunskog J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Dec; 134(6):4590. PubMed ID: 25669271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of the hard x-ray background in backlit pinhole imagers.
    Fein JR; Peebles JL; Keiter PA; Holloway JP; Klein SR; Kuranz CC; Manuel MJ; Drake RP
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2014 Nov; 85(11):11E610. PubMed ID: 25430356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential absorbed dose distributions in lineal energy for neutrons and gamma rays at the mono-energetic neutron calibration facility.
    Takada M; Baba M; Yamaguchi H; Fujitaka K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(4):481-90. PubMed ID: 15914511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Air kerma rate constants for gamma emitters used most often in practice.
    Ninkovic MM; Raicevic JJ; Adrovic F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):247-50. PubMed ID: 16381721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A modified geometric factor approach to internal gamma ray dosimetry.
    Gupta MM; Reddy AR; Gupta PC; Nagaratnam A
    Br J Radiol; 1976 Jan; 49(577):71-5. PubMed ID: 1276578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of hydration on the UV absorption coefficient of intact melanosomes.
    Lin E; Peles DN; Simon JD
    Photochem Photobiol Sci; 2012 Apr; 11(4):687-91. PubMed ID: 22231491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correction methodology for the spectral interfering γ-rays overlapping to the analytical peaks used in the analysis of 232Th.
    Yücel H; Köse E; Esen AN; Bor D
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2011 Jun; 69(6):890-7. PubMed ID: 21398134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Absorption in different tissues of cobalt 60 gamma radiation and roentgen rays with half-value layers from 1 mm. Al to 5 mm. Cu.
    JACOBSON LE; KNAUER I
    Radiology; 1956 Jan; 66(1):70-83. PubMed ID: 13280897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement of the mass energy-absorption coefficient of air for x-rays in the range from 3 to 60 keV.
    Buhr H; Büermann L; Gerlach M; Krumrey M; Rabus H
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Dec; 57(24):8231-47. PubMed ID: 23192280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.