BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

668 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16594110)

  • 1. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Stone AJ
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Burying the dead: the case against revival of pre-Roe and pre-Casey abortion statutes in a post-Casey world.
    Scott TL
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(2):355-89. PubMed ID: 11656256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproductive self-determination in the Third Circuit: the statutory proscription of wrongful birth and wrongful life claims as an unconstitutional violation of Planned Parenthood v. Casey's undue burden standard.
    Intromasso C
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2003; 24(2):101-20. PubMed ID: 15568248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Kassop N
    PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Informed consent civil actions for post-abortion psychological trauma.
    Eller TR
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1996; 71(4):639-70. PubMed ID: 11660407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions.
    Weissmann R
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1999; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mazurek v. Armstrong: should states be allowed to restrict the performance of abortions to licensed physicians only?
    Bazzelle RY
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):149-82. PubMed ID: 16200693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries.
    Smolin DM
    Cumberland Law Rev; 1989-1990; 20(1):71-163. PubMed ID: 15999438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prenatal screening, autonomy and reasons: the relationship between the law of abortion and wrongful birth.
    Scott R
    Med Law Rev; 2003; 11(3):265-325. PubMed ID: 16733877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
    McDonagh E
    Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abortion law today.
    Field MA
    J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The right of privacy and restraints on abortion under the "undue burden" test: a jurisprudential comparison of Planned Parenthood v. Casey with European practice and Italian law.
    Ross CS
    Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1993; 3():199-231. PubMed ID: 12091926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Family law I: abortion.
    Koscs ME
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1984; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A relational approach to moral decision-making: the majority opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Sullivan PA; Goldzwig SR
    Q J Speech; 1995 May; 81(2):167-90. PubMed ID: 11808622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker and Hurwitz in the deck and defrocked.
    Lucas R
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 May; 30(4):641-70. PubMed ID: 15237509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abortion, precedent, and the Constitution: a comment on Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    Maltz EM
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 68(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 11656531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states.
    Bradford CS
    Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements--right to privacy.
    Long SL; Ravenscraft P
    Akron Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 11664733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
    Borgmann CE
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.