These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

668 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16594110)

  • 41. Prenatal tort law and the personhood of the unborn child: a separate legal existence.
    Roden GJ
    St Thomas Law Rev; 2003; 16(1):207-86. PubMed ID: 16211760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Contemporary Australian abortion law: the description of a crime and the negation of a woman's right to abortion.
    Rankin MJ
    Monash Univ Law Rev; 2001; 27(2):229-52. PubMed ID: 16493805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions?
    Ezzard MM
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Law and life sciences. Abortion and the Supreme Court: round two.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1976 Oct; 6(5):15-7. PubMed ID: 972027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents.
    Ehrlich JS
    Berkeley Womens Law J; 2003; 18():61-180. PubMed ID: 15156878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Casey reflections.
    Cavendish EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):305-14. PubMed ID: 16526134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test.
    Burdick R
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Case reopens abortion issue for justices.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov; ():A19. PubMed ID: 16450459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The principles and principals of abortion compromise.
    Wing KR
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1993; 18(4):967-82. PubMed ID: 8120354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
    Bertz RC
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The abortion decision and evolving limits on state intervention.
    MacDougal D; Nasser WP
    Haw Bar J; 1975; 11():51-72. PubMed ID: 11664576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Roe v. Wade reaffirmed.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Aug; 13(4):21-2. PubMed ID: 6629744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Abortion regulation: Louisiana's abortive attempt.
    Vance RP
    LA Law Rev; 1974; 34(3):676-85. PubMed ID: 11663504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. After Ayotte: the need to defend abortion rights with renewed "purpose.".
    Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2552-73. PubMed ID: 16827220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Abortion issue moves to states: shift on federal bench spurs governors, legislators to battle Roe.
    Solomon D
    Wall St J (East Ed); 2006 Mar; ():A4. PubMed ID: 16578913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors.
    O'Shaughnessy M
    Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors.
    Scuder AC
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(3):711-41. PubMed ID: 16594112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Privacy rights and abortion outing: a proposal for using common-law torts to protect abortion patients and staff.
    Clapman A
    Yale Law J; 2003 Apr; 112(6):1545-76. PubMed ID: 15046034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. WomanCare of Southfield, P.C. v. Granholm.
    United States. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division
    Wests Fed Suppl; 2001; 143():827-48. PubMed ID: 16479703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Backdoor eugenics: the troubling implications of certain damages awards in wrongful birth and wrongful life claims.
    Stein JT
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2009; 40(1):1117-68. PubMed ID: 20718135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.