These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16594114)

  • 1. Sex selection: regulating technology enabling the predetermination of a child's gender.
    Jones OD
    Harv J Law Technol; 1992; 6(1):1-62. PubMed ID: 16594114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sex selection abortion and the boomerang effect of a woman's right to choose: a paradox of the skeptics.
    Kohm LM
    William Mary J Women Law; 1997; 4(1):91-128. PubMed ID: 16389677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In support of sex selection.
    Mamdani B
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2005; 2(1):26-7. PubMed ID: 16276627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sex selection and reproductive freedom.
    Renteln AD
    Womens Stud Int Forum; 1992; 15(3):405-26. PubMed ID: 11659708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A feminist is a person who answers "yes" to the question, "are women human?": an argument against the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for gender selection.
    Downing KK
    DePaul J Health Care Law; 2005; 8(2):431-60. PubMed ID: 16538759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Five Tamil Nadu doctors banned from practice for violating prenatal sex selection law.
    Kay M
    BMJ; 2013 Jun; 346():f3788. PubMed ID: 23757755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexism and "the superfluous female": arguments for regulating pre-implantation sex selection.
    Danis J
    Harv Womens Law J; 1995; 18():219-64. PubMed ID: 11660528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Moral issues and public policy concerns surrounding sex preselection.
    Stanley KM
    Logos (Santa Clara); 1988; 9():193-213. PubMed ID: 12708428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex selection for non-medical reasons.
    Dutch Health Council
    Bull Med Ethics; 1995 Jun; No. 109():8-10. PubMed ID: 11654282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The obstetrician's view: ethical and societal implications of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis.
    Smith RP; Lombaard H; Soothill PW
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Jul; 26(7):631-4. PubMed ID: 16856227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Everyday ethics: sex determination and ultrasound in Australia.
    Loblay V
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2009; 6(4):188-93. PubMed ID: 19839542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revisiting sex selection: the growing popularity of new sex selection methods revives an old debate.
    Darnovsky M
    Genewatch; 2004; 17(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 15083837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic selection of offspring characteristics.
    Robertson JA
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1996 Jun; 76(3):421-82. PubMed ID: 11660289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Where have all the young girls gone? Preconception gender selection in India and the United States.
    Farrell K
    Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 2002; 13(1):253-81. PubMed ID: 15233121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are sex selective abortions wrong?
    Johnston JM
    N Z Bioeth J; 2001 Feb; 2(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 15586984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of reproductive technology for sex selection for nonmedical reasons.
    Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Jun; 103(6):1418-22. PubMed ID: 25956364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Critical considerations on the legal regulation of sex selection (II)].
    Pérez Alonso EJ
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2002; (17):99-124. PubMed ID: 12703111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Choosing the sexual orientation of children.
    Stein E
    Bioethics; 1998 Jan; 12(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 11655306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ESHRE Task Force on ethics and Law 20: sex selection for non-medical reasons.
    Dondorp W; De Wert G; Pennings G; Shenfield F; Devroey P; Tarlatzis B; Barri P; Diedrich K
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Jun; 28(6):1448-54. PubMed ID: 23578946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Crying stones": a comparison of abortion in Japan and the United States.
    Wardle LD
    N Y Law Sch J Int Comp Law; 1993; 14(2-3):183-259. PubMed ID: 11659814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.