371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16594390)
1. In vitro biomechanical comparison of limited contat dynamic compression plate and locking compression plate.
Aguila AZ; Manos JM; Orlansky AS; Todhunter RJ; Trotter EJ; Van der Meulen MC
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2005; 18(4):220-6. PubMed ID: 16594390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A biomechanical comparison of 3.5 locking compression plate fixation to 3.5 limited contact dynamic compression plate fixation in a canine cadaveric distal humeral metaphyseal gap model.
Filipowicz D; Lanz O; McLaughlin R; Elder S; Werre S
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2009; 22(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 19597629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the mechanical behaviors of semicontoured, locking plate-rod fixation and anatomically contoured, conventional plate-rod fixation applied to experimentally induced gap fractures in canine femora.
Goh CS; Santoni BG; Puttlitz CM; Palmer RH
Am J Vet Res; 2009 Jan; 70(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 19119945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?
Ahmad M; Nanda R; Bajwa AS; Candal-Couto J; Green S; Hui AC
Injury; 2007 Mar; 38(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 17296199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ex vivo cyclic mechanical behaviour of 2.4 mm locking plates compared with 2.4 mm limited contact plates in a cadaveric diaphyseal gap model.
Irubetagoyena I; Verset M; Palierne S; Swider P; Autefage A
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2013; 26(6):479-88. PubMed ID: 24080774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A mechanical comparison of the locking compression plate (LCP) and the low contact-dynamic compression plate (DCP) in an osteoporotic bone model.
Snow M; Thompson G; Turner PG
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 18349780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro biomechanical comparison of a 4.5 mm narrow locking compression plate construct versus a 4.5 mm limited contact dynamic compression plate construct for arthrodesis of the equine proximal interphalangeal joint.
Ahern BJ; Showalter BL; Elliott DM; Richardson DW; Getman LM
Vet Surg; 2013 Apr; 42(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 23445267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical comparison of 3.5 mm broad dynamic compression plate, broad limited-contact dynamic compression plate, and narrow locking compression plate systems using interfragmentary gap models.
Uhl JM; Seguin B; Kapatkin AS; Schulz KS; Garcia TC; Stover SM
Vet Surg; 2008 Oct; 37(7):663-73. PubMed ID: 19134089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The mechanical behavior of locking compression plates compared with dynamic compression plates in a cadaver radius model.
Gardner MJ; Brophy RH; Campbell D; Mahajan A; Wright TM; Helfet DL; Lorich DG
J Orthop Trauma; 2005 Oct; 19(9):597-603. PubMed ID: 16247303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical Comparison of Locking Compression Plate and Limited Contact Dynamic Compression Plate Combined with an Intramedullary Rod in a Canine Femoral Fracture-Gap Model.
Matres-Lorenzo L; Diop A; Maurel N; Boucton MC; Bernard F; Bernardé A
Vet Surg; 2016 Apr; 45(3):319-26. PubMed ID: 26909507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical analysis of blade plate versus locking plate fixation for a proximal humerus fracture: comparison using cadaveric and synthetic humeri.
Siffri PC; Peindl RD; Coley ER; Norton J; Connor PM; Kellam JF
J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Sep; 20(8):547-54. PubMed ID: 16990726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro biomechanical comparison of locking compression plate fixation and limited-contact dynamic compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones.
Sod GA; Mitchell CF; Hubert JD; Martin GS; Gill MS
Vet Surg; 2008 Apr; 37(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 18394076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary (i.m.) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate.
Heiney JP; Barnett MD; Vrabec GA; Schoenfeld AJ; Baji A; Njus GO
J Trauma; 2009 Feb; 66(2):443-9. PubMed ID: 19204519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical testing of unstable humeral shaft fracture plating.
Catanzarite J; Alan R; Baig R; Forno P; Benson L
J Surg Orthop Adv; 2009; 18(4):175-81. PubMed ID: 19995496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of a 3.5 mm locking compression plate applied cranially and a 2.7 mm locking compression plate applied medially in a gap model of the distal aspect of the canine radius.
Uhl JM; Kapatkin AS; Garcia TC; Stover SM
Vet Surg; 2013 Oct; 42(7):840-6. PubMed ID: 24033354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single cycle to failure in torsion of three standard and five locking plate constructs.
Cabassu JB; Kowaleski MP; Skorinko JK; Blake CA; Gaudette GR; Boudrieau RJ
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2011; 24(6):418-25. PubMed ID: 21938313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can DCP and LCP plates generate more compression? The effect of multiple eccentrically placed screws and their drill positioning guides.
Ya'ish FM; Nanu AM; Cross AT
Injury; 2011 Oct; 42(10):1095-100. PubMed ID: 21450288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of conventional compression plates and locking compression plates using cantilever bending in an ilial fracture model.
Bruce CW; Gibson TW; Runciman RJ
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2014; 27(6):430-5. PubMed ID: 25345445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of a 5.5 mm limited-contact dynamic compression plate fixation with a 4.5 mm limited-contact dynamic compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones.
Sod GA; Mitchell CF; Hubert JD; Martin GS; Gill MS
Vet Surg; 2008 Apr; 37(3):289-93. PubMed ID: 18394077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
