723 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16594493)
1. What to know about JCAHO. Joint Commission survey process changing this year.
McLaughlin S
Health Facil Manage; 2006 Mar; 19(3):35-7. PubMed ID: 16594493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Preparing for a JCAHO survey.
Walpole JK
Healthc Facil Manag Ser; 1995 Apr; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 10158037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. JCAHO offers two alternative ways to fulfill the periodic performance review.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Oct; 23(10):1-5. PubMed ID: 14582373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Accreditation decision process supports continuous operational improvement.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 14746097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. JCAHO, unannounced: just-surveyed organizations share compliance tips.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2006 Apr; 31(4):45-9. PubMed ID: 16617920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Using the periodic performance review as a continuous standards compliance tool.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Jan; 25(1):1, 3. PubMed ID: 16515352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the full Periodic Performance Review (PPR), Option 1, Option 2, and Option 3.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):8-9. PubMed ID: 15484654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sample sizes set for organization assessment of compliance.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Oct; 23(10):9-10. PubMed ID: 14582376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Device dangers. Complying with the JCAHO's patient safety goals for clinical/biomedical equipment.
Keil O
Health Facil Manage; 2003 Nov; 16(11):31-3. PubMed ID: 14655433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Update on ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(5):15-30. PubMed ID: 10182300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. JCAHO evaluation plan expanded for Shared Visions-New Pathways.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):24. PubMed ID: 14746101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Unannounced survey process on track for full implementation in 2006.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Jan; 25(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 16515353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Communicating survey results.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Apr; 24(4):2, 8-9. PubMed ID: 15085693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. 2005 thresholds for Conditional Accreditation and Preliminary Denial of Accreditation.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Nov; 24(11):3. PubMed ID: 15587168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Standards, policy, and survey eligibility changes for 2001.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(6):7. PubMed ID: 11142238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of accreditation in the regulation of health-care facilities.
Keil O; Gallagher L
Regul Anal Med Waste; 1993 Mar; 1(6):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 10132827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Frequently asked questions about the unannounced survey process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Sep; 25(9):1, 3. PubMed ID: 16515347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. JCAHO survey reports: where to turn for help.
Keil OR
Health Facil Manage; 1991 Jun; 4(6):31-3. PubMed ID: 10110678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Scoring definitions revised for all accreditation manuals.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Feb; 21(2):5. PubMed ID: 11246634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Accreditation nomenclature revised, survey report clarified.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1989; 9(3-4):6. PubMed ID: 10313768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
