723 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16594493)
21. JCAHO's new accreditation process.
Siegel S
Health Care Law Mon; 2003 Nov; ():4-11. PubMed ID: 14651075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Top compliance issues for all of 2003.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 May; 24(5):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 15168568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Quality managers: periodic performance review can be a powerful quality tool. Don't hesitate to put your processes under the microscope.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2004 Aug; 29(8):105-8. PubMed ID: 15338822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. PFP Clinical/Service Groups and priority focus areas focus survey process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):5-6, 25. PubMed ID: 14746092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. How SII may affect your PPR.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Oct; 28(10):1, 3. PubMed ID: 19133597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Should you submit your PPR results to JCAHO? Take the opportunity to obtain valuable feedback.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2004 Aug; 29(8):108-10. PubMed ID: 15338823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Update: additional scoring changes for all 2009 accreditation manuals.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Jun; 29(6):8-9. PubMed ID: 19579473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Show and tell. Time to teach your ES staff how to shine in the JCAHO's new survey process.
Blyth PL
Health Facil Manage; 1997 Sep; 10(9):32-4, 36, 38. PubMed ID: 10170095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Simplifying compliance activities.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Mar; 21(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 11270206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. On-site survey brings Shared Vision-New Pathways to the heart of health care organizations.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 14746094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. What is a type I and how do you clear one?
Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Feb; 21(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 11246635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Top type 1s for all of 2001. Common problem areas identified.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 May; 22(5):4-5. PubMed ID: 12016718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Team identifies ways to mitigate risks in new accreditation process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 14746096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Special report--ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation. Joint Commission introduces new requirements to integrate performance measurement into accreditation process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(1):26-7, 29. PubMed ID: 10346346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Joint commission to survey compliance with new USP-NF Chapter on compounding sterile preparations.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Apr; 24(4):4-5. PubMed ID: 15085694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Resolving type Is in a written progress report.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Aug; 21(8):6-7. PubMed ID: 11519348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Compliance data for the Joint Commission's 2003 National Patient Safety Goals.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):12-3. PubMed ID: 15484657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. JCAHO--preparing for 1996.
Healthc Hazard Mater Manage; 1995 Dec; 9(3):11. PubMed ID: 10154348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Pilot surveys put new process to the test.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 14746095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The new JCAHO accreditation report.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):21, 26-7. PubMed ID: 14746098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
