145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16594581)
1. Physiologic VDD versus nonphysiologic VVI pacing in canine 3rd-degree atrioventricular block.
Bulmer BJ; Sisson DD; Oyama MA; Solter PF; Grimm KA; Lamont L
J Vet Intern Med; 2006; 20(2):257-71. PubMed ID: 16594581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Physiologic VDD versus nonphysiologic VVI pacing in canine 3rd degree atrioventricular block.
McMillan FD
J Vet Intern Med; 2006; 20(6):1287; author reply 1287-8. PubMed ID: 17186838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term outcome of physiologic VDD pacing versus non-physiologic VVI pacing in dogs with high-grade atrioventricular block.
Lichtenberger J; Scollan KF; Bulmer BJ; Sisson DD
J Vet Cardiol; 2015 Mar; 17(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 25726416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ECG of the month. Complete AV block, and lack of capture (pacing) of the ventricles by the single-lead atrial-sensing VDD system.
Prosek R; Sisson DD; Bulmer BJ; Oyama MA
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2004 Sep; 225(6):845-6. PubMed ID: 15485041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Preimplantation echo Doppler evaluation of VVI versus DDD pacing.
Soussou AI; Helmy MG; Guindy RR
Echocardiography; 1995 Jul; 12(4):335-49. PubMed ID: 10150780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hemodynamic benefit of atrioventricular synchrony: prediction from baseline Doppler-echocardiographic variables.
Pearson AC; Janosik DL; Redd RM; Buckingham TA; Labovitz AJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Jun; 13(7):1613-21. PubMed ID: 2723274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative functional effects of chronic ventricular demand and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing.
Yee R; Benditt DG; Kostuk WJ; Ko PT; Purves P; Klein GJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1984 Jan; 7(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 6199764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single-chamber ventricular pacing increases markers of left ventricular dysfunction compared with dual-chamber pacing.
Naegeli B; Kurz DJ; Koller D; Straumann E; Furrer M; Maurer D; Minder E; Bertel O
Europace; 2007 Mar; 9(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 17272326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single versus dual chamber pacing in the young: noninvasive comparative evaluation of cardiac function.
Horenstein MS; Karpawich PP; Tantengco MV
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 May; 26(5):1208-11. PubMed ID: 12765448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cardiac output in single-lead VDD pacing versus rate-matched VVIR pacing.
Nowak B; Voigtländer T; Himmrich E; Liebrich A; Poschmann G; Epperlein S; Treese N; Meyer J
Am J Cardiol; 1995 May; 75(14):904-7. PubMed ID: 7732998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implantation of a single-lead atrioventricular synchronous (VDD) pacemaker in a dog with naturally occurring 3rd-degree atrioventricular block.
Bulmer BJ; Oyama MA; Lamont LA; Sisson DD
J Vet Intern Med; 2002; 16(2):197-200. PubMed ID: 11899038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term complication rates in ventricular, single lead VDD, and dual chamber pacing.
Wiegand UK; Bode F; Bonnemeier H; Eberhard F; Schlei M; Peters W
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Oct; 26(10):1961-9. PubMed ID: 14516336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Temporary transvenous VDD pacing as a bridge to permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with sepsis and haemodynamically significant atrioventricular block.
Lepillier A; Otmani A; Waintraub X; Ollitrault J; Le Heuzey J; Lavergne T
Europace; 2012 Jul; 14(7):981-5. PubMed ID: 22213794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Atrioventricular Synchronous Pacing Using a Leadless Ventricular Pacemaker: Results From the MARVEL 2 Study.
Steinwender C; Khelae SK; Garweg C; Chan JYS; Ritter P; Johansen JB; Sagi V; Epstein LM; Piccini JP; Pascual M; Mont L; Sheldon T; Splett V; Stromberg K; Wood N; Chinitz L
JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2020 Jan; 6(1):94-106. PubMed ID: 31709982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility and sensing thresholds of temporary single-lead VDD pacing in intensive care.
Voigtländer T; Nowak B; Bärenfänger P; Himmrich E; Treese N; Becker HJ; Meyer J
Am J Cardiol; 1997 May; 79(10):1360-3. PubMed ID: 9165158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The haemodynamic importance of atrioventricular synchrony and rate increase at rest and during exercise.
Kristensson BE; Arnman K; Rydén L
Eur Heart J; 1985 Sep; 6(9):773-8. PubMed ID: 4076212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dual chamber pacemaker implantation in dogs with atrioventricular block.
Hildebrandt N; Stertmann WA; Wehner M; Schneider I; Neu H; Schneider M
J Vet Intern Med; 2009; 23(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 19175717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Holter-monitored heart rhythm during atrioventricular synchronous and fixed-rate ventricular pacing.
Kristensson BE; Karlsson O; Rydén L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1986 Jul; 9(4):511-8. PubMed ID: 2426669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the acute and long-term hemodynamic effects of ventricular inhibited and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing.
Kruse I; Arnman K; Conradson TB; Rydén L
Circulation; 1982 May; 65(5):846-55. PubMed ID: 7074746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The effect of a lower stimulation frequency on the AV synchronicity of VDD pacemakers].
Schuchert A; Schmidt W; Jakob M; Jung W; Karmann W; Kreuzer J; Staedt U; Stertmann WA; Treese N; Meinertz T
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1997 Oct; 122(43):1303-7. PubMed ID: 9410693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
