170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16595459)
1. Use of cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate new technologies in orthopaedics. The case of alternative bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty.
Bozic KJ; Morshed S; Silverstein MD; Rubash HE; Kahn JG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Apr; 88(4):706-14. PubMed ID: 16595459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Cost-Effectiveness of Dual Mobility Implants for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Computer-Based Cost-Utility Model.
Barlow BT; McLawhorn AS; Westrich GH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(9):768-777. PubMed ID: 28463921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A cost-effectiveness assessment of dual-mobility bearings in revision hip arthroplasty.
Khoshbin A; Haddad FS; Ward S; O hEireamhoin S; Wu J; Nherera L; Atrey A
Bone Joint J; 2020 Sep; 102-B(9):1128-1135. PubMed ID: 32862681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost Analysis of Ceramic Heads in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Carnes KJ; Odum SM; Troyer JL; Fehring TK
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Nov; 98(21):1794-1800. PubMed ID: 27807111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-term complications have more effect on cost-effectiveness of THA than implant longevity.
Shearer DW; Youm J; Bozic KJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 May; 473(5):1702-8. PubMed ID: 25560958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip.
Chang RW; Pellisier JM; Hazen GB
JAMA; 1996 Mar; 275(11):858-65. PubMed ID: 8596224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of age on cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with total knee arthroplasty in the U.S.
Ghomrawi HM; Eggman AA; Pearle AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Mar; 97(5):396-402. PubMed ID: 25740030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of ten-year survivorship of hip prostheses with use of conventional polyethylene, metal-on-metal, or ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.
Milošev I; Kovač S; Trebše R; Levašič V; Pišot V
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Oct; 94(19):1756-63. PubMed ID: 23032586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The epidemiology of bearing surface usage in total hip arthroplasty in the United States.
Bozic KJ; Kurtz S; Lau E; Ong K; Chiu V; Vail TP; Rubash HE; Berry DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jul; 91(7):1614-20. PubMed ID: 19571083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revision total hip arthoplasty: factors associated with re-revision surgery.
Khatod M; Cafri G; Inacio MC; Schepps AL; Paxton EW; Bini SA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Mar; 97(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 25740025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Alternative bearing surface options for revision total hip arthroplasty.
Patel D; Parvizi J; Sharkey PF
Instr Course Lect; 2011; 60():257-67. PubMed ID: 21553778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness model comparing dual-mobility to fixed-bearing designs for total hip replacement in France.
Epinette JA; Lafuma A; Robert J; Doz M
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Apr; 102(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 26803224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Alternative bearings in total hip arthroplasty in the young patient.
Kamath AF; Prieto H; Lewallen DG
Orthop Clin North Am; 2013 Oct; 44(4):451-62. PubMed ID: 24095062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement used in primary total hip arthroplasty.
Cummins JS; Tomek IM; Kantor SR; Furnes O; Engesaeter LB; Finlayson SR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Mar; 91(3):634-41. PubMed ID: 19255224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.
Rampersaud YR; Tso P; Walker KR; Lewis SJ; Davey JR; Mahomed NN; Coyte PC
Spine J; 2014 Feb; 14(2):244-54. PubMed ID: 24239803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry.
Mäkelä KT; Eskelinen A; Pulkkinen P; Paavolainen P; Remes V
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Oct; 90(10):2160-70. PubMed ID: 18829914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-utility of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared to conventional total hip replacement in young active patients with osteoarthritis.
Heintzbergen S; Kulin NA; Ijzerman MJ; Steuten LM; Werle J; Khong H; Marshall DA
Value Health; 2013; 16(6):942-52. PubMed ID: 24041344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of an alumina-on-alumina bearing system in total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the hip.
Seyler TM; Bonutti PM; Shen J; Naughton M; Kester M
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Nov; 88 Suppl 3():116-25. PubMed ID: 17079377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Choice of Prosthetic Implant Combinations in Total Hip Replacement: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Using UK and Swedish Hip Joint Registries Data.
Fawsitt CG; Thom HHZ; Hunt LP; Nemes S; Blom AW; Welton NJ; Hollingworth W; López-López JA; Beswick AD; Burston A; Rolfson O; Garellick G; Marques EMR
Value Health; 2019 Mar; 22(3):303-312. PubMed ID: 30832968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty-Reducing Hospital Cost Through Fixed Implant Pricing.
Collins KD; Chen KK; Ziegler JD; Schwarzkopf R; Bosco JA; Iorio R
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Sep; 32(9S):S141-S143. PubMed ID: 28366311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
