396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16596418)
1. Implantation of central venous ports with catheter insertion via the right internal jugular vein in oncology patients: single center experience.
Charvát J; Linke Z; Horáèková M; Prausová J
Support Care Cancer; 2006 Nov; 14(11):1162-5. PubMed ID: 16596418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complications and Management of Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Ports in Cancer Patients at a University Hospital in Oman.
D'Souza PC; Kumar S; Kakaria A; Al-Sukaiti R; Al-Baimani K; Hamid RS; Mittal AK; Al-Balushi M; Burney IA; Al-Moundhri MS
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J; 2021 Feb; 21(1):e103-e109. PubMed ID: 33777430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device.
Biffi R; Corrado F; de Braud F; de Lucia F; Scarpa D; Testori A; Orsi F; Bellomi M; Mauri S; Aapro M; Andreoni B
Eur J Cancer; 1997 Jul; 33(8):1190-4. PubMed ID: 9301441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subcutaneous chest ports via the internal jugular vein. A retrospective study of 117 oncology patients.
Yip D; Funaki B
Acta Radiol; 2002 Jul; 43(4):371-5. PubMed ID: 12225477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Late complications associated with totally implantable venous access port implantation via the internal jugular vein.
Tsuruta S; Goto Y; Miyake H; Nagai H; Yoshioka Y; Yuasa N; Takamizawa J
Support Care Cancer; 2020 Jun; 28(6):2761-2768. PubMed ID: 31724073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of catheter diameter on left innominate vein in breast cancer patients after totally implantable venous access port placement.
Song MG; Seo TS; Kim YH; Cho SB; Chung HH; Lee SH; Jung E
J Vasc Access; 2018 Nov; 19(6):615-619. PubMed ID: 29560786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Totally implantable central venous access ports for long-term chemotherapy. A prospective study analyzing complications and costs of 333 devices with a minimum follow-up of 180 days.
Biffi R; de Braud F; Orsi F; Pozzi S; Mauri S; Goldhirsch A; Nolè F; Andreoni B
Ann Oncol; 1998 Jul; 9(7):767-73. PubMed ID: 9739444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Best choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer therapy: a randomized trial.
Biffi R; Orsi F; Pozzi S; Pace U; Bonomo G; Monfardini L; Della Vigna P; Rotmensz N; Radice D; Zampino MG; Fazio N; de Braud F; Andreoni B; Goldhirsch A
Ann Oncol; 2009 May; 20(5):935-40. PubMed ID: 19179550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Common and uncommon complications of totally implantable central venous ports: a pictorial essay.
Perdikakis E; Kehagias E; Tsetis D
J Vasc Access; 2012; 13(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 22307469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Central venous port implantations via the cephalic vein applying an intravasal electrographic control of the catheter tip position: a single-center experience of 316 cases.
Schenck M; Schneider T; Rübben H; Eisenhardt A
World J Urol; 2012 Jun; 30(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 21874511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Surgical complications of totally implantable venous access port in children with malignant tumors].
Li H; Gao YX; Wang SL; Yao HX
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2022 Dec; 54(6):1167-1171. PubMed ID: 36533350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors that predict increased catheter tip movement in left internal jugular vein implantable venous access ports upon standing.
Wallace JA; Afonso E; Yu H; Birchard K; Isaacson A
J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 25613147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Peripheral venous access ports: outcomes analysis in 109 patients.
Bodner LJ; Nosher JL; Patel KM; Siegel RL; Biswal R; Gribbin CE; Tokarz R
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2000; 23(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 10821892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided placement of central venous ports via internal jugular vein: retrospective analysis of 1254 port implantations at a single center.
Ahn SJ; Kim HC; Chung JW; An SB; Yin YH; Jae HJ; Park JH
Korean J Radiol; 2012; 13(3):314-23. PubMed ID: 22563269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiological placement of chest ports in pediatric oncology patients.
Cil BE
Eur Radiol; 2004 Nov; 14(11):2015-9. PubMed ID: 15249980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retained catheter: a rare complication associated with totally implantable venous ports.
Nishinari K; Bernardi CV; Wolosker N; Yazbek G
J Vasc Access; 2010; 11(2):159-61. PubMed ID: 20119912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implanting totally implantable venous access ports in the upper arm is feasible and safe for patients with early breast cancer.
Xu H; Chen R; Jiang C; You S; Zhu Q; Li Y; Li S; Zha X; Wang J
J Vasc Access; 2020 Sep; 21(5):609-614. PubMed ID: 31841061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Complications of Totally Implantable Central Venous Catheters (Ports) Inserted via the Internal Jugular Vein Under Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy Guidance in Adult Oncology Patients: A Single-Center Experience.
Kartsouni V; Moschouris H; Bersimis F; Gkeneralis G; Gkeli M; Dodoura S; Chouchourelou A; Fezoulidis I; Kotsakis A; Rountas C
Cureus; 2022 Jul; 14(7):e27485. PubMed ID: 36060391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implantable venous access devices in children with severe hemophilia: a tertiary pediatric institutional experience.
Bedoya MA; Raffini L; Durand R; Acord MR; Srinivasan A; Krishnamurthy G; Vatsky S; Escobar F; Cahill AM
Pediatr Radiol; 2020 Jul; 50(8):1148-1155. PubMed ID: 32390060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Totally implantable central venous access devices in patients with cancer. Experience at a private oncology center].
Cortés-Flores AO; Morgan-Villela G; Juárez-Uzeta EA; Fuentes-Orozco C; Jiménez-Tornero J; González-Ojeda A
Cir Cir; 2012; 80(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 23351446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
