These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16596617)

  • 1. Combined permutation test and mixed-effect model for group average analysis in fMRI.
    Mériaux S; Roche A; Dehaene-Lambertz G; Thirion B; Poline JB
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 May; 27(5):402-10. PubMed ID: 16596617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring predictive and reproducible modeling with the single-subject FIAC dataset.
    Chen X; Pereira F; Lee W; Strother S; Mitchell T
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 May; 27(5):452-61. PubMed ID: 16565951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Permutation testing of orthogonal factorial effects in a language-processing experiment using fMRI.
    Suckling J; Davis MH; Ooi C; Wink AM; Fadili J; Salvador R; Welchew D; Sendur L; Maxim V; Bullmore ET
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 May; 27(5):425-33. PubMed ID: 16596618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnosis of single-subject and group fMRI data with SPMd.
    Zhang H; Luo WL; Nichols TE
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 May; 27(5):442-51. PubMed ID: 16615119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applying FSL to the FIAC data: model-based and model-free analysis of voice and sentence repetition priming.
    Beckmann CF; Jenkinson M; Woolrich MW; Behrens TE; Flitney DE; Devlin JT; Smith SM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 May; 27(5):380-91. PubMed ID: 16565953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Permutation tests for factorially designed neuroimaging experiments.
    Suckling J; Bullmore E
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2004 Jul; 22(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 15195286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional imaging analysis contest (FIAC) analysis according to AFNI and SUMA.
    Saad ZS; Chen G; Reynolds RC; Christidis PP; Hammett KR; Bellgowan PS; Cox RW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 May; 27(5):417-24. PubMed ID: 16568421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inference for magnitudes and delays of responses in the FIAC data using BRAINSTAT/FMRISTAT.
    Taylor JE; Worsley KJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 May; 27(5):434-41. PubMed ID: 16568426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with brainvoyager QX: From single-subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self-organizing group independent component analysis.
    Goebel R; Esposito F; Formisano E
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 May; 27(5):392-401. PubMed ID: 16596654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determining hierarchical functional networks from auditory stimuli fMRI.
    Patel RS; Bowman FD; Rilling JK
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 May; 27(5):462-70. PubMed ID: 16568419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Motivation and synthesis of the FIAC experiment: Reproducibility of fMRI results across expert analyses.
    Poline JB; Strother SC; Dehaene-Lambertz G; Egan GF; Lancaster JL
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 May; 27(5):351-9. PubMed ID: 16583364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mixed-effect statistics for group analysis in fMRI: a nonparametric maximum likelihood approach.
    Roche A; Mériaux S; Keller M; Thirion B
    Neuroimage; 2007 Nov; 38(3):501-10. PubMed ID: 17890108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Level set segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images based on local Gaussian distribution fitting energy.
    Wang L; Chen Y; Pan X; Hong X; Xia D
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 May; 188(2):316-25. PubMed ID: 20230858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two approaches to repetition suppression.
    Noppeney U; Penny WD
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 May; 27(5):411-6. PubMed ID: 16565948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Activation detection in fMRI using a maximum energy ratio statistic obtained by adaptive spatial filtering.
    Hossein-Zadeh GA; Ardekani BA; Soltanian-Zadeh H
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 22(7):795-805. PubMed ID: 12906234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. HBM functional imaging analysis contest data analysis in wavelet space.
    Aston JA; Turkheimer FE; Brett M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 May; 27(5):372-9. PubMed ID: 16565952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal HRF and smoothing parameters for fMRI time series within an autoregressive modeling framework.
    Galka A; Siniatchkin M; Stephani U; Groening K; Wolff S; Bosch-Bayard J; Ozaki T
    J Integr Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 9(4):429-52. PubMed ID: 21213413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples.
    Nichols TE; Holmes AP
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 Jan; 15(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 11747097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neuroanatomical distribution of five semantic components of verbs: evidence from fMRI.
    Kemmerer D; Castillo JG; Talavage T; Patterson S; Wiley C
    Brain Lang; 2008 Oct; 107(1):16-43. PubMed ID: 17977592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An introduction to anatomical ROI-based fMRI classification analysis.
    Etzel JA; Gazzola V; Keysers C
    Brain Res; 2009 Jul; 1282():114-25. PubMed ID: 19505449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.