These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16596902)

  • 1. Assisted reproduction and gender selection: "why boys?".
    Confino E; Kazer RR; Zhang JX
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2006; 51(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 16596902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Australian attitudes toward sex-selection technology.
    Kippen R; Evans A; Gray E
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Apr; 95(5):1824-6. PubMed ID: 21163475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gender choice: is it playing God?
    O'Keefe M
    Christ Century; 2004 May; 121(9):12-3. PubMed ID: 15543673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preconception gender selection for nonmedical reasons.
    Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Sep; 82 Suppl 1():S232-5. PubMed ID: 15363738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acting parentally: an argument against sex selection.
    McDougall R
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Oct; 31(10):601-5. PubMed ID: 16199604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gender preferences and demand for preconception sex selection: a survey among pregnant women in Pakistan.
    Zubair F; Dahl E; Sher Shah S; Ahmed M; Brosig B
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Feb; 22(2):605-9. PubMed ID: 17062579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender "tailored" conceptions: should the option of embryo gender selection be available to infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology?
    Merhi ZO; Pal L
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Aug; 34(8):590-3. PubMed ID: 18667646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High and growing disapproval of sex-selection technology in Australia.
    Kippen R; Gray E; Evans A
    Reprod Health; 2018 Sep; 15(1):134. PubMed ID: 30185179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gender selection: pressure from patients and industry should not alter our adherence to ethical guidelines.
    Sauer MV
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 191(5):1543-5. PubMed ID: 15547523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The choice of gender: is elective gender selection, indeed, sexist?
    Gleicher N; Barad DH
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Nov; 22(11):3038-41. PubMed ID: 17766924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproductive technologies and our attitudes towards children.
    Davis NA
    Logos (Santa Clara); 1988; 9():51-77. PubMed ID: 12708420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gender by design: not ready for prime time.
    Reame NK
    Am J Bioeth; 2001; 1(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 11808589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concerns of sex selection and regulation in the report on Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law.
    Bahadur G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2005 Jul; 11(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 16102278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When and why does the dream die? Or does it?
    Penzias AS
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Feb; 81(2):274-5. PubMed ID: 14967356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex preselection in New York City: who chooses which sex and why.
    Khatamee MA; Leinberger-Sica A; Matos P; Weseley AC
    Int J Fertil; 1989; 34(5):353-4. PubMed ID: 2571596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are we talking about the butterflies or a butterfly effect? Comment on 'No country is an island'.
    Kahraman S
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2005 Jul; 11(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 16102279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex selection for social purposes in Israel: quest for the "perfect child" of a particular gender or centuries old prejudice against women?
    Landau R
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Sep; 34(9):e10. PubMed ID: 18757610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attitudes towards sex selection in the Western world.
    Van Balen F
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Jul; 26(7):614-8. PubMed ID: 16856222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parents should have right to choose sex of child, say MPs.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2005 Apr; 330(7494):745. PubMed ID: 15802705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mandatory sex selection and mitochondrial transfer.
    Brandt R
    Bioethics; 2018 Sep; 32(7):437-444. PubMed ID: 29979468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.