229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16596905)
1. Seminal hyperviscosity is associated with poor outcome of controlled ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination: a prospective study.
Esfandiari N; Gotlieb L; Casper RF
Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2006; 51(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 16596905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Seminal hyperviscosity is associated with poor outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a prospective study.
Esfandiari N; Burjaq H; Gotlieb L; Casper RF
Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5):1739-43. PubMed ID: 18249373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The evaluation of the sperm migration test as a predictor for success with intrauterine insemination.
Buckett WM; Luckas MJ; Aird IA; Kingsland CR; Lewis-Jones DI
Int J Fertil Womens Med; 1998; 43(5):257-61. PubMed ID: 9863619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of luteal phase support on pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination cycles: a prospective randomized study.
Erdem A; Erdem M; Atmaca S; Guler I
Fertil Steril; 2009 Jun; 91(6):2508-13. PubMed ID: 18692788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of semen characteristics on IUI combined with mild ovarian stimulation.
Yalti S; Gürbüz B; Sezer H; Celik S
Arch Androl; 2004; 50(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 15277001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Prognostic factors of pregnancy in intrauterine insemination].
Barros Delgadillo JC; Rojas Ruiz JC; Molina Munguía AC; Villalobos Acosta S; Sánchez Solís V; Barroso Villa G; Gaviño Gaviño F
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2006 Dec; 74(12):611-25. PubMed ID: 17539317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of sperm parameters on intrauterine insemination pregnancy rate.
Akram A; Imtiaz SA; Jahan S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Jun; 18(6):342-6. PubMed ID: 18760044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian stimulation for treatment of infertility: an audit of a new IUI programme in a low resource setting.
Ikechebelu JI; Okeke CA
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Jan; 27(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 17365462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of aromatase inhibitor co-treatment for controlled ovarian stimulation.
Bedaiwy MA; Forman R; Mousa NA; Al Inany HG; Casper RF
Hum Reprod; 2006 Nov; 21(11):2838-44. PubMed ID: 16877370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The additional value of ovarian hyperstimulation in intrauterine insemination for couples with an abnormal postcoital test and a poor prognosis: a randomized clinical trial.
Steures P; van der Steeg JW; Hompes PG; Bossuyt PM; Habbema JD; Eijkemans MJ; Koks CA; Boudrez P; van der Veen F; Mol BW
Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1618-24. PubMed ID: 17561002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of treatment with ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination in women with unilateral tubal occlusion diagnosed by hysterosalpingography.
Farhi J; Ben-Haroush A; Lande Y; Fisch B
Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):396-400. PubMed ID: 17445812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the effect of the absence of sperm with rapid and linear progressive motility on subsequent pregnancy rates following intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilization.
Bollendorf A; Check JH; Lurie D
J Androl; 1996; 17(5):550-7. PubMed ID: 8957699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of the methods of separating high-quality sperm for intrauterine insemination].
She H; Dong NJ; Yuan YY
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2008 Nov; 14(11):1007-10. PubMed ID: 19102502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Analysis of results of intrauterine insemination performed once or twice per stimulated cycle].
Ruiz Anguas J; Anta Jaen E; Durán Monterrosas L; Kably Ambe A
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2005 Feb; 73(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 21961341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. No difference in cycle pregnancy rate and in cumulative live-birth rate between women with surgically treated minimal to mild endometriosis and women with unexplained infertility after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination.
Werbrouck E; Spiessens C; Meuleman C; D'Hooghe T
Fertil Steril; 2006 Sep; 86(3):566-71. PubMed ID: 16952506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic factors influencing pregnancy rate after stimulated intrauterine insemination.
Tay PY; Raj VR; Kulenthran A; Sitizawiah O
Med J Malaysia; 2007 Oct; 62(4):286-9. PubMed ID: 18551930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of pregnancy by intrauterine insemination using CASA estimates and strict criteria in patients with male factor infertility.
Shibahara H; Obara H; Ayustawati ; Hirano Y; Suzuki T; Ohno A; Takamizawa S; Suzuki M
Int J Androl; 2004 Apr; 27(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 15149462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Homologous intrauterine insemination as a therapeutic possibility in andrologically-induced sterility].
Hänggi W; Birkhäuser MH; Ledermann B; Brandenberger AW; Sieber A
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1993 Sep; 53(9):635-40. PubMed ID: 8224724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized controlled trial comparing superovulation with letrozole versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone combined with intrauterine insemination for couples with unexplained infertility who had failed clomiphene citrate stimulation and intrauterine insemination.
Gregoriou O; Vlahos NF; Konidaris S; Papadias K; Botsis D; Creatsas GK
Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):678-83. PubMed ID: 17961561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Experience with intrauterine insemination].
Sánchez MI; Cafatti C; Costoya A
Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1990; 55(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 2284472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
