These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16597036)

  • 1. [Comparison of four methods for sperm counting].
    Hu YA; Lu JC; Lu NQ; Shao Y; Huang YF
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2006 Mar; 12(3):222-4, 227. PubMed ID: 16597036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Quality evaluation of three different sperm counting chambers].
    Lu J; Lü N; Huang Y; Li PS; Fisch H
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2004 Oct; 10(10):755-7, 760. PubMed ID: 15562789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Quality evaluation of 3 sperm counting chambers by computer-assisted sperm analysis system].
    Cai J; Zeng Y; Song C; Mo ML; Yin B; Lin Q; Huang J
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2009 Mar; 15(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 19452697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of Makler counting chamber and improved Neubauer hemocytometer in sperm concentration measurement.
    Sukcharoen N; Ngeamjirawat J; Chanprasit Y; Aribarg A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1994 Sep; 77(9):471-6. PubMed ID: 7706966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is flow cytometry really adapted to the determination of sperm concentration?
    Lu JC; Chen F; Xu HR; Wu YM; Xia XY; Huang YF; Lu NQ
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2007; 67(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 17558894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of counting chamber type on CASA outcomes of equine semen analysis.
    Hoogewijs MK; de Vliegher SP; Govaere JL; de Schauwer C; de Kruif A; van Soom A
    Equine Vet J; 2012 Sep; 44(5):542-9. PubMed ID: 22150933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discrepancies in the determination of sperm concentration using Bürker-Türk, Thoma and Makler counting chambers.
    Christensen P; Stryhn H; Hansen C
    Theriogenology; 2005 Mar; 63(4):992-1003. PubMed ID: 15710187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of bovine seminal quality assessments using different viewing chambers with a computer-assisted semen analyzer.
    Lenz RW; Kjelland ME; Vonderhaar K; Swannack TM; Moreno JF
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Feb; 89(2):383-8. PubMed ID: 20952528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of semen preparation on casa motility results in cryopreserved bull spermatozoa.
    Contri A; Valorz C; Faustini M; Wegher L; Carluccio A
    Theriogenology; 2010 Aug; 74(3):424-35. PubMed ID: 20451996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The comparison of assessment of pigeon semen motility and sperm concentration by conventional methods and the CASA system (HTM IVOS).
    Klimowicz MD; Nizanski W; Batkowski F; Savic MA
    Theriogenology; 2008 Jul; 70(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 18423566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of semen counting chambers as determined by the use of latex beads.
    Seaman EK; Goluboff E; BarChama N; Fisch H
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Oct; 66(4):662-5. PubMed ID: 8816636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of different counting chambers using a computer-assisted semen analyzer.
    Peng N; Zou X; Li L
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2015; 61(5):307-13. PubMed ID: 26214093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the semen analysis results obtained from two branded computer-aided sperm analysis systems.
    Hu YA; Lu JC; Shao Y; Huang YF; Lü NQ
    Andrologia; 2013 Oct; 45(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 22928934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated sperm concentration analysis with a new flow cytometry-based device, S-FCM.
    Tsuji T; Okada H; Fujisawa M; Hamaguchi Y; Kamidono S
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Mar; 117(3):401-8. PubMed ID: 11888079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Advances in standardization and quality control for the analysis of sperm quality parameters].
    Huang YF; Lu JC
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2007 Nov; 13(11):963-8. PubMed ID: 18077904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of a novel computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system using multitarget-tracking algorithms.
    Tomlinson MJ; Pooley K; Simpson T; Newton T; Hopkisson J; Jayaprakasan K; Jayaprakasan R; Naeem A; Pridmore T
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Apr; 93(6):1911-20. PubMed ID: 19200972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part I. Comparison of counting chambers.
    Johnson JE; Boone WR; Blackhurst DW
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Jan; 65(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 8557132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Capillary-loaded particle fluid dynamics: effect on estimation of sperm concentration.
    Douglas-Hamilton DH; Smith NG; Kuster CE; Vermeiden JP; Althouse GC
    J Androl; 2005; 26(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 15611575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part II. Determination of the working range of a computer-automated semen analyzer.
    Johnson JE; Boone WR; Blackhurst DW
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Jan; 65(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 8557133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of commercially available chamber slides for computer-aided analysis of human sperm.
    Dardmeh F; Heidari M; Alipour H
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2021 Apr; 67(2):168-175. PubMed ID: 33375858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.