167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16597929)
1. Deletion of BCY1 from the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome is semidominant and induces autolytic phenotypes suitable for improvement of sparkling wines.
Tabera L; Muñoz R; Gonzalez R
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 72(4):2351-8. PubMed ID: 16597929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Autophagy in wine making.
Cebollero E; Rejas MT; González R
Methods Enzymol; 2008; 451():163-75. PubMed ID: 19185720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Construction of a recombinant autolytic wine yeast strain overexpressing the csc1-1 allele.
Cebollero E; Gonzalez-Ramos D; Gonzalez R
Biotechnol Prog; 2009; 25(6):1598-604. PubMed ID: 19725125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biodiversity of autolytic ability in flocculent Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains suitable for traditional sparkling wine fermentation.
Perpetuini G; Di Gianvito P; Arfelli G; Schirone M; Corsetti A; Tofalo R; Suzzi G
Yeast; 2016 Jul; 33(7):303-12. PubMed ID: 26804203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains on traditional sparkling wines production.
Di Gianvito P; Perpetuini G; Tittarelli F; Schirone M; Arfelli G; Piva A; Patrignani F; Lanciotti R; Olivastri L; Suzzi G; Tofalo R
Food Res Int; 2018 Jul; 109():552-560. PubMed ID: 29803483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of ATR-FTIR microspectroscopy to monitor autolysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells in a base wine.
Cavagna M; Dell'Anna R; Monti F; Rossi F; Torriani S
J Agric Food Chem; 2010 Jan; 58(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 20050702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Overexpression of csc1-1. A plausible strategy to obtain wine yeast strains undergoing accelerated autolysis.
Cebollero E; Martinez-Rodriguez A; Carrascosa AV; Gonzalez R
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2005 May; 246(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15869955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using mixed inocula of Saccharomyces cerevisiae killer strains to improve the quality of traditional sparkling-wine.
Velázquez R; Zamora E; Álvarez M; Álvarez ML; Ramírez M
Food Microbiol; 2016 Oct; 59():150-60. PubMed ID: 27375256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trends in wine microbiology.
Ramón D
Microbiologia; 1997 Dec; 13(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 9608514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selection of indigenous yeast strains for the production of sparkling wines from native Apulian grape varieties.
Garofalo C; Berbegal C; Grieco F; Tufariello M; Spano G; Capozzi V
Int J Food Microbiol; 2018 Nov; 285():7-17. PubMed ID: 30007201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Yeast Autolysis in Sparkling Wine Aging: Use of Killer and Sensitive Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains in Co-Culture.
Lombardi SJ; De Leonardis A; Lustrato G; Testa B; Iorizzo M
Recent Pat Biotechnol; 2015; 9(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 27076091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic determinants of the release of mannoproteins of enological interest by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Gonzalez-Ramos D; Gonzalez R
J Agric Food Chem; 2006 Dec; 54(25):9411-6. PubMed ID: 17147426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three different targets for the genetic modification of wine yeast strains resulting in improved effectiveness of bentonite fining.
Gonzalez-Ramos D; Quirós M; Gonzalez R
J Agric Food Chem; 2009 Sep; 57(18):8373-8. PubMed ID: 19705828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensory and analytical study of rose sparkling wines manufactured by second fermentation in the bottle.
Hidalgo P; Pueyo E; Pozo-Bayón MA; Martínez-Rodríguez AJ; Martín-Alvarez P; Polo MC
J Agric Food Chem; 2004 Oct; 52(21):6640-5. PubMed ID: 15479034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Induction of autophagy by second-fermentation yeasts during elaboration of sparkling wines.
Cebollero E; Gonzalez R
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2006 Jun; 72(6):4121-7. PubMed ID: 16751523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flocculation and transcriptional adaptation to fermentation conditions in a recombinant wine yeast strain defective for KNR4/SMI1.
Penacho V; Blondin B; Valero E; Gonzalez R
Biotechnol Prog; 2012; 28(2):327-36. PubMed ID: 22065482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of in vivo activation of protein kinase A under non-dissociable conditions through the overexpression of wild-type and mutant regulatory subunits in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Portela P; Zaremberg V; Moreno S
Microbiology (Reading); 2001 May; 147(Pt 5):1149-1159. PubMed ID: 11320118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence for yeast autophagy during simulation of sparkling wine aging: a reappraisal of the mechanism of yeast autolysis in wine.
Cebollero E; Carrascosa AV; Gonzalez R
Biotechnol Prog; 2005; 21(2):614-6. PubMed ID: 15801807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic engineering of industrial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Le Borgne S
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 824():451-65. PubMed ID: 22160914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of polysaccharide-degrading wine yeast transformants on the efficiency of wine processing and wine flavour.
Louw C; La Grange D; Pretorius IS; van Rensburg P
J Biotechnol; 2006 Oct; 125(4):447-61. PubMed ID: 16644051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
