These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16598660)

  • 1. Comparison of two risk assessment instruments for sexual offenders.
    Looman J
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Apr; 18(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16598660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The factor structure of static actuarial items: its relation to prediction.
    Barbaree HE; Langton CM; Peacock EJ
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Apr; 18(2):207-26. PubMed ID: 16937082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the SORAG and the Static-99 on Belgian sex offenders committed to a forensic facility.
    Ducro C; Pham T
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Jan; 18(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 16598662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type.
    Bartosh DL; Garby T; Lewis D; Gray S
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2003 Aug; 47(4):422-38. PubMed ID: 12971183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unguided clinical and actuarial assessment of re-offending risk: a direct comparison with sex offenders in Denmark.
    Bengtson S; Långström N
    Sex Abuse; 2007 Jun; 19(2):135-53. PubMed ID: 17534713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does consideration of psychopathy and sexual deviance add to the predictive validity of the static-99R?
    Looman J; Morphett NA; Abracen J
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2013 Aug; 57(8):939-65. PubMed ID: 22641857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of modified versions of the Static-99 and the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide.
    Nunes KL; Firestone P; Bradford JM; Greenberg DM; Broom I
    Sex Abuse; 2002 Jul; 14(3):253-69. PubMed ID: 12087686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does Static-99 predict recidivism among older sexual offenders?
    Hanson RK
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Oct; 18(4):343-55. PubMed ID: 17136627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Actuarial risk assessment of sexual offenders: The psychometric properties of the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG).
    Rettenberger M; Rice ME; Harris GT; Eher R
    Psychol Assess; 2017 Jun; 29(6):624-638. PubMed ID: 28594206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different actuarial risk measures produce different risk rankings for sexual offenders.
    Barbaree HE; Langton CM; Peacock EJ
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Oct; 18(4):423-40. PubMed ID: 17136625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders.
    Harris GT; Rice ME; Quinsey VL; Lalumière ML; Boer D; Lang C
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):413-25. PubMed ID: 14593842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-validation of the risk matrix 2000 sexual and violent scales.
    Craig LA; Beech A; Browne KD
    J Interpers Violence; 2006 May; 21(5):612-33. PubMed ID: 16574636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The significance of offending behavior for predicting sexual recidivism among sex offenders of various age groups.
    Janka C; Gallasch-Nemitz F; Biedermann J; Dahle KP
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 22425764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000: a comparison with the static-99 and the sex offender risk appraisal guide.
    Kingston DA; Yates PM; Firestone P; Babchishin K; Bradford JM
    Sex Abuse; 2008 Dec; 20(4):466-84. PubMed ID: 18840901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictive validity of the SVR-20 and Static-99 in a Dutch sample of treated sex offenders.
    de Vogel V; de Ruiter C; van Beek D; Mead G
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Jun; 28(3):235-51. PubMed ID: 15264445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes.
    Rettenberger M; Matthes A; Boer DP; Eher R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Apr; 54(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 19168639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Criminal recidivism among sexual offenders].
    Bengtson S; Lund J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Dec; 170(49):4035-9. PubMed ID: 19087745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk factors for criminal recidivism in older sexual offenders.
    Fazel S; Sjöstedt G; Långström N; Grann M
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Apr; 18(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 16633906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short-term predictive validity of the static-99 and static-99-R for indigenous and nonindigenous Australian sexual offenders.
    Smallbone S; Rallings M
    Sex Abuse; 2013 Jun; 25(3):302-16. PubMed ID: 23389506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An investigation of the validity and reliability of the Criminal Sentiments Scale in a sample of treated sex offenders.
    Witte TD; Di Placido C; Gu D; Wong SC
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Jul; 18(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 16988891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.