These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Hydrophilic poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials: dimensional accuracy, wettability, and effect on gypsum hardness. Panichuttra R; Jones RM; Goodacre C; Munoz CA; Moore BK Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(3):240-8. PubMed ID: 1810315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hydrophilicity of unset and set elastomeric impression materials. Rupp F; Geis-Gerstorfer J Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):552-4. PubMed ID: 21209992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study. Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of relative humidity on the hydrophilicity of unset elastomeric impression materials. Rupp F; Axmann D; Geis-Gerstorfer J Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18350951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations. Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under different conditions. Katyayan PA; Kalavathy N; Katyayan M Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):881-2. PubMed ID: 22484900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surface detail reproduction under simulated pulpal pressure: a 3-dimensional optical profilometer and scanning electron microscopy evaluation. Acar O; Erkut S; Lakshmipathy M J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):102-13. PubMed ID: 22867807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials. Wadhwani CP; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Raigrodski AJ J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):530-9. PubMed ID: 15942613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wettability of impression materials treated with disinfectants. DeWald JP; Nakajima H; Schniederman E; Okabe T Am J Dent; 1992 Apr; 5(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 1524745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flow profile of regular and fast-setting elastomeric impression materials using a shark fin testing device. Lawson NC; Cakir D; Ramp L; Burgess JO J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 21649832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinically relevant mechanical properties of elastomeric impression materials. Chai J; Takahashi Y; Lautenschlager EP Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 9728115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surface quality and long-term dimensional stability of current elastomeric impression materials after disinfection. Walker MP; Rondeau M; Petrie C; Tasca A; Williams K J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 17559536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The wetting of surface-treated silicone impression materials by gypsum mixes containing disinfectants and modifiers. Abdelaziz KM; Combe EC; Hodges JS J Prosthodont; 2005 Jun; 14(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16011621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contact angles of contemporary type 3 impression materials. Balkenhol M; Eichhorn M; Wostmann B Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):396-8. PubMed ID: 19639079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]