199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16599333)
1. [Full arch impression techniques utilizing addition type poly vinyl siloxane for fabrication of tooth born fixed partial dentures].
Nissan J; Rosner O; Barnea E; Assif D
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2006 Jan; 23(1):42-6, 71. PubMed ID: 16599333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques.
Nissan J; Laufer BZ; Brosh T; Assif D
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Feb; 83(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 10668027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of wash bulk on the accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impressions.
Nissan J; Gross M; Shifman A; Assif D
J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Apr; 29(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 11966969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictable definitive impressions for multiple indirect restorations using a modified putty and wash impression procedure.
Leong EW; Cheng AC; Khin NT; Lee H; Leong DJ
Singapore Dent J; 2007 Dec; 29(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18472530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of one-step vs. two-step impression techniques on long-term accuracy and dimensional stability when the finish line is within the gingival sulcular area.
Levartovsky S; Zalis M; Pilo R; Harel N; Ganor Y; Brosh T
J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 23734561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental study on the use of spacer foils in two-step putty and wash impression procedures using silicone impression materials.
Mann K; Davids A; Range U; Richter G; Boening K; Reitemeier B
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 25453563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques.
Mishra S; Chowdhary R
J Investig Clin Dent; 2010 Aug; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25427185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of one-step versus two-step putty wash addition silicone impression technique.
Hung SH; Purk JH; Tira DE; Eick JD
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 May; 67(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 1527737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of various putty-wash impression techniques on marginal fit of cast crowns.
Nissan J; Rosner O; Bukhari MA; Ghelfan O; Pilo R
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(1):e37-42. PubMed ID: 23342356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Stone Models Fabricated by Three Different Impression Techniques Using Two Brands of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials.
Garg S; Kumar S; Jain S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Aug; 20(8):928-934. PubMed ID: 31797849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An alternative impression technique for complete dentures.
Yilmaz B; Özçelik TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Feb; 111(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 24286641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A clinical pilot study of the dimensional accuracy of double-arch and complete-arch impressions.
Cox JR; Brandt RL; Hughes HJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 May; 87(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12070514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of impression tray design and impression technique upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Taylor WG
J Dent; 1991 Oct; 19(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 1806594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative evaluation of tray spacer thickness and repeat pour on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinyl siloxane impression material: in vitro study.
Kumar S; Yadav D; Yadav R; Arora A
Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 24992848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of different impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of impressions using various elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study.
Singh K; Sahoo S; Prasad KD; Goel M; Singh A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 22430701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of impression materials for complete-arch fixed partial dentures.
Dounis GS; Ziebert GJ; Dounis KS
J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Feb; 65(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 2051350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
